Post

Log inSign up

Post

  • user avatar
    Aaron Blake
    @AaronBlake
    The proof in the pudding is if Trump actually fires/reprimands Pirro. Not sure how he could stomach her completely contradicting his claims and letting the “radical-left” “thugs” off scot-free. If he just politely disagrees, it feels more like kayfabe.
    user avatar
    Kaitlan Collins
    @kaitlancollins
    8h
    Trump: “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM.”
    5:31 PM · Aug 1, 202611KViews
  • user avatar
    Jeff M
    @UWMoose
    7h
    Or more simply - the dotard in chief is a nutcase.
    160
  • user avatar
    Jaywhysee
    @CathroJennifer
    5h
    The problem here is that he actually believes his own lies.
    86
  • user avatar
    waxaxe
    @waxaxe1
    4h
    Do his statements make it more likely that the judge decides to dismiss with prejudice? I don’t know what factors into that decision.
    42

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email

Relevant people

Avatar
Aaron Blake@AaronBlakeFollow
Senior political reporter at @CNN. Ex-@washingtonpost.

Trending now

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.