Bjorn Lomborg on X: "Rich World Net Zero has a tiny impact Even if the US, EU, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, and the rest of the rich world go Net Zero by 2050 it will only reduce global temperatures by 0.10°C (0.18°F) in 2100 Still, it will cost $100s of trillions https://t.co/88qhA6UamR, , https://t.co/FwQYq8ri6H You can see all the references in my Twitter thread: https://t.co/r86NvtDWir" / X

Bjorn Lomborg
@BjornLomborg
Rich World Net Zero has a tiny impact Even if the US, EU, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, and the rest of the rich world go Net Zero by 2050 it will only reduce global temperatures by 0.10°C (0.18°F) in 2100 Still, it will cost $100s of trillions data.ene.iiasa.ac.at/ngfs, , t.co/FwQYq8ri6H You can see all the references in my Twitter thread: x.com/BjornLomborg/s…
Bjorn Lomborg
@BjornLomborg
Jul 10
Rich World Net Zero has a tiny impact Even if the US, EU, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, and the rest of the rich world go Net Zero by 2050 it will only reduce global temperatures by 0.10°C (0.18°F) in 2100 Still, it will cost $100s of trillions data.ene.iiasa.ac.at/ngfs,
11:15 AM · Aug 1, 202632.2KViews
MichaelJEllis
@mellis1163
11h
And that is if the models are accurate, which they likely are not. Milankovich cycles and other natural causes have always caused the climate to change. Net Zero is a false fantasy that human activity controls climate. A climate that over Earth’s long record has on average been
A #1, Emperor of the North Pole
@railboss
11h
Yes but it’s not like the Politicians are spending their own money to virtue signal. When it comes to taxpayer money there’s always plenty more where that came from.
Allan Lindemark
@minkonto
8h
Would have been nice if we started a bit before so or wouldnt be so expensive. But you and your friends delayed it. Pay up?

Post