Thank you for this project! I have been using MusicBrainz Picard and I just tried wrtag to see how it could fit into my workflow. I must say, you certainly achieved the goal of making this tool easy to setup and use!
There are tags that I get with MusicBrainz Picard and not with wrtag, such as performers, engineers, arrangers, lyricists, etc, but I see that that the lyricist tag is already being implemented. Would you say your goal is to keep expanding the tag list as much as possible, or do you have a certain scope in mind? If you keep adding tags, I could see wrtag replacing MusicBrainz completely for my use case.
For now, though, I'm thinking about using wrtag and MusicBrainz Picard together. wrtag is proving very efficient for cover art, ReplayGain, lyrics, bpm and key, while MusicBrainz Picard can cover the missing tags. Do you have any recommendations for which tool I should use before the other, or about specific settings that could make them work best together?
Thank you for this project! I have been using MusicBrainz Picard and I just tried wrtag to see how it could fit into my workflow. I must say, you certainly achieved the goal of making this tool easy to setup and use!
There are tags that I get with MusicBrainz Picard and not with wrtag, such as performers, engineers, arrangers, lyricists, etc, but I see that that the lyricist tag is already being implemented. Would you say your goal is to keep expanding the tag list as much as possible, or do you have a certain scope in mind? If you keep adding tags, I could see wrtag replacing MusicBrainz completely for my use case.
For now, though, I'm thinking about using wrtag and MusicBrainz Picard together. wrtag is proving very efficient for cover art, ReplayGain, lyrics, bpm and key, while MusicBrainz Picard can cover the missing tags. Do you have any recommendations for which tool I should use before the other, or about specific settings that could make them work best together?