You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I actually think all those open issues/bugs are hitting the same underlying error but doing different things after hence not all the same crash message.
I've added a testcase for what (I think is) the underlying issue of all those in #6990 as well as disabling Generator Function Jit BUT enabling the safer Generator Loop Body Jit.
I haven't gone through them all but I think there are 30+ issues open that relate to this. Many of them are dups but it's hard to confirm how many.
IF we disable generator JIT and enable the simpler loop-body-jit not sure what to do with all these issues whether to close them or keep them for ref if we ever re-visit generator JIT - my loop-body-jit PR includes a test case that I think captures the issue behind 5+ of the relevant issues but not sure about all of them.
A scenario to entertain: adding reproducers for these issues to the suite and close them if they pass with current loop-only JITing, then we will have a set of tests to clear when we reenable full function JITing.
A scenario to entertain: adding reproducers for these issues to the suite and close them if they pass with current loop-only JITing, then we will have a set of tests to clear when we reenable full function JITing.
Activity
rhuanjl commentedon May 2, 2024
I actually think all those open issues/bugs are hitting the same underlying error but doing different things after hence not all the same crash message.
I've added a testcase for what (I think is) the underlying issue of all those in #6990 as well as disabling Generator Function Jit BUT enabling the safer Generator Loop Body Jit.
rhuanjl commentedon May 3, 2024
I haven't gone through them all but I think there are 30+ issues open that relate to this. Many of them are dups but it's hard to confirm how many.
IF we disable generator JIT and enable the simpler loop-body-jit not sure what to do with all these issues whether to close them or keep them for ref if we ever re-visit generator JIT - my loop-body-jit PR includes a test case that I think captures the issue behind 5+ of the relevant issues but not sure about all of them.
ppenzin commentedon May 28, 2024
A scenario to entertain: adding reproducers for these issues to the suite and close them if they pass with current loop-only JITing, then we will have a set of tests to clear when we reenable full function JITing.
rhuanjl commentedon May 30, 2024
I added a reduced test case for one point that I think underpins a lot of the issues here: https://github.com/chakra-core/ChakraCore/blob/master/test/es6GeneratorJit/newtest.js
I didn't want to multiply equivalent cases; though it's hard to always work out exactly what is causing the issue.