Fix formatting of contents section in overview.md

[schalkventer]

🎯 Changes

✅ Checklist

• I have tested this code locally with pnpm test.

🚀 Release Impact

• This change affects published code, and I have generated a changeset.
• This change is docs/CI/dev-only (no release).

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the contents table of contents to use a plain dash separator in several links for clearer, more consistent display.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 587431b3-cf7c-4fbf-9a3c-2b2b48b75693

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95e25bd and 1290575.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/overview.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates docs/overview.md, replacing the — HTML entity with a plain dash character in the Contents table-of-contents entries for four links.

Changes

Documentation formatting update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
TOC separator update docs/overview.md	Changed the separator in four Contents links from the — HTML entity to a plain dash character.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hopped through docs so neat,
Swapped an entity for a dash so sweet,
Four little links now read with ease,
No more mdash to hop and squeeze,
A tiny fix, a tidy feat! 🐇

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is just the template; it lacks an actual change summary, checklist status, and release-impact details.	Replace the template placeholders with a brief change summary, mark the checklist items, and state whether this is docs-only or needs a changeset.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the PR's change: formatting the contents section in overview.md.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}