Repository navigation
chore(ci): restore the lessons journal and require devex review - #126962
pauldambra wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Generated-By: PostHog Desktop Task-Id: 33e41530-91b9-47fd-86cb-7aa6d6dcc6eb
|
Merging to
After your PR is submitted to the merge queue, this comment will be automatically updated with its status. If the PR fails, failure details will also be posted here |
|
Risk: No findings This change deletes implementation-note lines from the internal CI lessons journal and adds that journal to the Devex team's CODEOWNERS entries so future edits require their review. It touches no code, workflows, or configuration, and the ownership addition strengthens rather than weakens review gating; no security issues found. Sentinel reviewed |
🤖 CI report✅ Trunk lane — non-backend lane (
|
|
✅ Security review complete — No findings above the confidence threshold, in 2 min. Add the |
HostHog preview —
|
Robot:
Problem
Developers use the CI journal to check failed ideas, but implementation notes obscure its lessons.
Why: Keep the journal focused on previous attempts and reasons not to repeat them.
Changes
How did you test this code?
Checked Markdown formatting, preflight checks, and ownership with the repository CODEOWNERS matcher.
Test rationale: Documentation and ownership only; no new tests needed.
Release status
Docs update
🤖 Agent context
Autonomy: Human-driven (agent-assisted)
Agent: PostHog Slack app (Codex), GPT-6
Skills:
/establishing-code-ownership,/verifying-changes,/running-ci-preflight,/hogli,/writing-pr-descriptions.More context for AI agents
Created with PostHog from a Slack thread