-
Join 3,679 other subscribers
Sign me up for RSS!
- Recommendation letters for awards: can you get help from the person?
- What should a full professor do?
- Referee finding: a role for AI?
- Recommendation letters for colleagues: a role for AI?
- Recommendation letters: be careful about bias
- Recommendation letters for people you know well
- Recommendation letters: important shortcuts
- Just in time learning advantages
- Four exciting postdocs in Ecology and Evolution at Washington University in St. Louis!
- Postdoctoral positions available in our lab!
- behavioral ecology Collaboration Communication Creativity Ethics Experimental design Graduate school Grant proposals Grants Interviewing Jobs Life in a biology department Managing an academic career Mentoring New assistant professor New ideas NSF Presentations and seminars Public Communication Publishing your work Research Scientific community Scientific meetings Social interactions Teaching The joy of teaching Uncategorized Undergraduates Writing Your lab group
Top Posts & Pages
Blogroll
Archives
Meta
Category Archives: Refereeing
Referee finding: a role for AI?
I had to ask ten people just to find two willing to review a paper I serve as editor for. I wanted three people but decided to go with two. Everyone knows how hard it is these days to get … Continue reading
Posted in Publishing your work, Refereeing
Tagged academia, ai, Publishing, referees, Research, reviewers, science, writing
Leave a comment
Reviewer declines assignment
Happy to receive, happy to give? Or doesn’t it work that way any more? Why is it so hard to find people willing to referee? I’m serving as editor for a few things right now and am getting very tired … Continue reading
Posted in Managing an academic career, Publishing your work, Refereeing
Tagged Charles Darwin, freeloader, freerider, Peer review, referee, reviewer
5 Comments
A sting on bogus publishers! Watch out!
Do you get invitations to publish nearly every day? Are most of the places inappropriate and unheard of? How do you sort it out? If you think this is not a big problem, just look at a news report on … Continue reading
How to review a grant proposal
There are only four things that you should consider when you review a proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation. You should weight them more or less equally. By that, I mean that weakness in any one of these elements … Continue reading
Posted in Grant proposals, Refereeing
Tagged broader impacts, creativity, grant proposal, methods, National Science Foundation, new ideas, NIH, NSF, Peer review, productivity, Research, science, United States
7 Comments