Skip to main content

Reducing False Alarm Rates in Neonatal Intensive Care: A New Machine Learning Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XLI

Abstract

In neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), 87.5% of alarms by the monitoring system are false alarms, often caused by the movements of the neonates. Such false alarms are not only stressful for the neonates as well as for their parents and caregivers, but may also lead to longer response times in real critical situations. The aim of this project was to reduce the rates of false alarms by employing machine learning algorithms (MLA), which intelligently analyze data stemming from standard physiological monitoring in combination with cerebral oximetry data (in-house built, OxyPrem). Materials & Methods: Four popular MLAs were selected to categorize the alarms as false or real: (i) decision tree (DT), (ii) 5-nearest neighbors (5-NN), (iii) naïve Bayes (NB) and (iv) support vector machine (SVM). We acquired and processed monitoring data (median duration (SD): 54.6 (± 6.9) min) of 14 preterm infants (gestational age: 26 6/7 (± 2 5/7) weeks). A hybrid method of filter and wrapper feature selection generated the candidate subset for training these four MLAs. Results: A high specificity of >99% was achieved by all four approaches. DT showed the highest sensitivity (87%). The cerebral oximetry data improved the classification accuracy. Discussion & Conclusion: Despite a (as yet) low amount of data for training, the four MLAs achieved an excellent specificity and a promising sensitivity. Presently, the current sensitivity is insufficient since, in the NICU, it is crucial that no real alarms are missed. This will most likely be improved by including more subjects and data in the training of the MLAs, which makes pursuing this approach worthwhile.

D. Ostojic and S. Guglielmini have contributed equally for this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolf M, Keel M, von Siebenthal K et al (1996) Improved monitoring of preterm infants by Fuzzy logic. Technol Health Care 4:193–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sendelbach S, Funk M (2013) Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Adv Crit Care 24:378–386. quiz 87-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson KR, Hagadorn JI, Sink DW (2017) Alarm safety and alarm fatigue. Clin Perinatol 44:713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li T, Matsushima M, Timpson W et al (2018) Epidemiology of patient monitoring alarms in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lawless ST (1994) Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:981–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson AEW, Ghassemi MM, Nemati S et al (2016) Machine learning and decision support in critical care. P Ieee 104:444–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerka P, Grigiene J, Sirbikyte G (2015) Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Comput Law Secur Rev 31:376–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleiser S, Ostojic D, Nasseri N et al (2018) In vivo precision assessment of a near-infrared spectroscopy-based tissue oximeter (OxyPrem v1.3) in neonates considering systemic hemodynamic fluctuations. J Biomed Opt 23:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Proença M, Grossenbacher O, Dasen S, et al. (2018) Performance assessment of a dedicated reflectance pulse oximeter in a neonatal intensive care unit. In: James patton UIaC, editor. 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  10. Webb AR (2002) Statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Aha DW, Bankert RLA (1996) Comparative evaluation of sequential feature selection algorithms. Learning from data lecture notes in statistics, vol 112. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrashekar G, Ferat S (2014) A survey on feature selection methods. Comput Electr Eng Elsevier 40:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eerikainen LM, Vanschoren J, Rooijakkers MJ et al (2016) Reduction of false arrhythmia alarms using signal selection and machine learning. Physiol Meas 37:1204–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Plesinger F, Klimes P, Halamek J et al (2016) Taming of the monitors: reducing false alarms in intensive care units. Physiol Meas 37:1313–1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Monasterio V, Burgess F, Clifford GD (2012) Robust classification of neonatal apnoea-related desaturations. Physiol Meas 33:1503–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Nano-Tera RTD project NewbornCare, the Clinical Research Priority Program (CRPP) Molecular Imaging Network Zürich (MINZ) of the University of Zurich and the Swiss National Science Foundation project 159490.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Ostojic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ostojic, D. et al. (2020). Reducing False Alarm Rates in Neonatal Intensive Care: A New Machine Learning Approach. In: Ryu, PD., LaManna, J., Harrison, D., Lee, SS. (eds) Oxygen Transport to Tissue XLI. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1232. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34461-0_36

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics