Abstract
Health care professionals must not only have knowledge, but also be able to organise, synthesise and apply this knowledge in such a way that it promotes the development of clinical reasoning. Panels of Virtual patients (VPs) are widely being used in health professions education to facilitate the development of clinical reasoning. VPs can also be used to teach wider educational outcomes such as communication skills, resource utilisation and longitudinal patient care. This chapter will define virtual patients and examine the evidence behind their use in health professions learning and teaching. The chapter will discuss virtual patient design, such as gamification. Finally, the chapter will discuss where this pedagogical innovation is best integrated into assessment and potential barriers to implementation into existing curricula.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- VP:
-
Virtual Patient
- VPs:
-
Virtual Patients
References
Arya S, Mulla Z, Kupesic Plavsic S (2017) Role of pelvic ultrasound simulation. Clin Teach 15(6):457–461
Begg M (2010) Virtual patients: practical advice for clinical authors using labyrinth. Clin Teach 7(3):202–205
Berman A, Biguet G, Stathakarou N et al (2017) Virtual Patients in a behavioral medicine massive open online course (MOOC): a qualitative and quantitative analysis of participants’ perceptions. Acad Psychiatry 41(5):631–641
Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR et al (2016) The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med 91(9):1217–1222
Berman N, Fall L, Maloney C, Levine D (2006) Computer-assisted instruction in clinical education: a roadmap to increasing CAI implementation. Adv Health Sci Educ 13(3):373–383
Berman N, Fall L, Smith S et al (2009) Integration strategies for using virtual Patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med 84(7):942–949
Bitzer M (1966) Clinical nursing instruction via the PLATO simulated laboratory. Nurs Res 15(2):144–150
Boyle J, Quail N, Loo X, Linn A (2016) Flipping the classroom: is it worth the bother? Clin Teach 14(2):137–138
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42
Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ (2007) Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 241:1178–1184
Consorti F, Mancuso R, Nocioni M, Piccolo A (2012) Efficacy of virtual patients in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Comput Educ 59(3):1001–1008
Cook DA, Triola MM (2009) Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 43:303–311
Cook DA (2009) The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 31(2):158–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802691393
Cook D, Andriole D, Durning S, Roberts N, Triola M (2010a) Longitudinal research databases in medical education: facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions. Acad Med 85(8):1340–1346
Cook D, Erwin P, Triola M (2010b) Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 85(10):1589–1602
Cook D, Friedman C, Greene P et al (2007) Effective use of educational technology in medical education. AAMC Institute for Improving Medical Education. Available via: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Effective%20Use%20of%20Educational.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Daniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ et al (2019) Clinical reasoning assessment methods: a scoping review and practical guidance. Acad Med 94(6):902–912
Denson P (2018) Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 122:48–58
Electronic Virtual Patients (2019) Electronic virtual Patients website. Available via https://virtualpatients.eu. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Ellaway R, Topps D, Lee S, Armson H (2015) Virtual patient activity patterns for clinical learning. Clin Teach 12(4):267–271
Eva KW (2005) What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 39(1):98–106
Evans K, Daines W, Tsui J, Strehlow M, Maggio P, Shieh L (2015) Septris: a novel, mobile, online, simulation game that improves sepsis recognition and management. Acad Med 90(2):180–184
Feldman L, Shihab H, Thiemann D et al (2013) Impact of providing fee data on laboratory test ordering. JAMA Intern Med 173(10):903–908
Hardy S, Brown G (2010) Virtual patients and online video resources: useful when patient availability is reduced? Clin Teach 7(4):292–293
Harries R, Rashid M, Smitham P et al (2016) What shape do UK trainees want their training to be? Results of a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6(10):e010461
Hatala R, Brooks L, Norman G (2003) Practice makes perfect: the critical role of mixed practice in the acquisition of ECG interpretation skills. Adv Health Sci Educ 8:17–26
Hege I, Kononowicz A, Kiesewetter J, Foster-Johnson L (2018) Uncovering the relation between clinical reasoning and diagnostic accuracy – an analysis of learner’s clinical reasoning processes in virtual patients. PLoS One 13(10):e0204900
Hege I, Ropp V, Adler M et al (2007) Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning. Med Teach 29(8):791–797
Heng N, Anbarasan T (2018) Comments on: “collaborative use of virtual patients after a lecture enhances learning with minimal investment of cognitive load”. Med Teach 41(1):118–119
Higgs J, Jensen GM (2019) Clinical reasoning. In: Higgs J, Jensen GM, Loftus S, Christensen N (eds) Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 4th edn. Elsevier, Edinburgh
Huwendiek S, Duncker C, Reichert F et al (2013) Learner preferences regarding integrating, sequencing and aligning virtual patients with other activities in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a focus group study. Med Teach 35:920–929
Khan K, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P (2013) The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part II: organisation & administration. Med Teach 35(9):e1447–e1463
Kleffner R, Flatten J, Leaver-Fay A et al (2017) Foldit standalone: a video game-derived protein structure manipulation interface using Rosetta. Bioinformatics 33(17):2765–2767
Klein M, Otto B, Fischer M, Stark R (2018) Fostering medical students’ clinical reasoning by learning from errors in clinical case vignettes: effects and conditions of additional prompting procedures to foster self-explanations. Adv Health Sci Educ 24:331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-09870-5
Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kononowicz A, Zary N, Edelbring S, Corral J, Hege I (2015) Virtual patients – what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ 15(1):11
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York
Levinson W, Kallewaard M, Bhatia RS (2015) On behalf of the choosing wisely international working group, et al ‘choosing wisely’: a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 24:167–174
Lin C, Chang E, Clinciu D et al (2018) Using modified information delivery to enhance the traditional pharmacy OSCE program at TMU – a pilot study. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 158:147–152
Litchfield I, Bentham L, Hill A, McManus R, Lilford R, Greenfield S (2015) Routine failures in the process for blood testing and the communication of results to patients in primary care in the UK: a qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives. BMJ Qual Saf 24(11):681–690
Marei H, Donkers J, Al-Eraky M, Van Merrienboer J (2018) Collaborative use of virtual patients after a lecture enhances learning with minimal investment of cognitive load. Med Teach 41:332–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1472372
Marquet O, Alberico C, Adlakha D, Hipp J (2017) Examining motivations to play Pokémon GO and their influence on perceived outcomes and physical activity. JMIR Serious Games 5(4):e21
McCoy L, Lewis J, Dalton D (2016) Gamification and multimedia for medical education: a landscape review. J Am Osteopath Assoc 116(1):22–34
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A (2017) The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10(6):549–559
Motz P, Gray M, Sawyer T et al (2018) Virtual antenatal encounter and standardized simulation assessment (VANESSA): pilot study. JMIR Serious Games 6(2):e8
Muller D, Ornstein K (2007) Perceptions of and attitudes towards medical errors among medical trainees. Med Educ 41(7):645–652
Noonan Z, Boyle J, Pope L, Ditchfield C, Leach J, McDowall S (2018) Quarantining the OSCE: reflections on the Glasgow experience. Clin Teach. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12993
Norman GR, Eva KW (2010) Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 44(1):94–100
Norman G (2014) Research challenges in digital education. Perspect Med Educ 3(4):260–265
Pantelidis P, Chorti A, Papagiouvanni I et al (2018) Virtual and augmented reality in medical education. In: Tsoulfas G (ed) Medical and surgical education – past, present and future. IntechOpen, London, pp 77–97
Posel N, Mcgee J, Fleiszer D (2014) Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Med Teach 37(9):813–818
Quail N, Holmes K, Linn A, Rea P, Livingstone D, Boyle J (2018) Serious digital games using virtual Patients and digital chalk-talk videos: a novel approach to teaching acute diabetes Care in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. Diabet Med 35(S1):112–135
Satava R (2006) Assessing surgery skills through simulation. Clin Teach 3(2):107–111
Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP (2007) How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 41:1133–1139
Seewoonarain S, Barrett M (2017) The technological evolution in surgical skills. Clin Teach 14(5):370–371
Singh H, Onakpoya I, Thompson M (2016) Diagnostic errors. World Health Organization. Available via: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252410/9789241511636-eng.pdf;jsessionid=9BC584CFD622CF7ADC54D6BD7C9D915D?sequence=1. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Sperl-Hillen J, O’Connor P, Ekstrom H et al (2013) Using simulation technology to teach diabetes care management skills to resident physicians. J Diabetes Sci Technol 7(5):1243–1254
Talbot T, Sagae K, John B, Rizzo A (2012) Sorting out the virtual patient. Int J Gaming Comput-Mediated Simul 4(3):1–19
Urresti-Gundlach M, Tolks D, Kiessling C, Wagner-Menghin M, Härtl A, Hege I (2017) Do virtual patients prepare medical students for the real world? Development and application of a framework to compare a virtual patient collection with population data. BMC Med Educ 17(1):174
Van Bruggen L, Manrique-van Woudenbergh M, Spierenburg E, Vos J (2012) Preferred question types for computer-based assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature study. Perspect Med Educ 1(4):162–171
Zhou L, Tait G, Sandhu S, Steiman A, Lake S (2018) Online virtual cases to teach resource stewardship. Clin Teach 16:220–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12804
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quail, N.P.A., Boyle, J.G. (2019). Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education. In: Rea, P. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24281-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24281-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24280-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24281-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)