Key Points
-
Translational regulation can be global or mRNA specific, and most examples of translational regulation that have been described so far affect the rate-limiting initiation step.
-
Global control of translation is frequently exerted by regulating the phosphorylation or availability of initiation factors. Two of the most well-known examples are the regulation of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E availability by 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), and the modulation of the levels of active ternary complex by eIF2α phosphorylation.
-
mRNA-specific translational control is driven by RNA sequences and/or structures that are commonly located in the untranslated regions of the transcript. These features are usually recognized by regulatory proteins or micro RNAs (miRNAs).
-
Quasi-circularization of mRNAs can be mediated by the cap structure and the poly(A) tail via the eIF4E–eIF4G–polyA-binding-protein (PABP) interaction. Such interactions between the 5′ and the 3′ ends of mRNAs could provide a spatial framework for the action of regulatory factors that bind to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR). However, other forms of 5′–3′-end interactions are likely to occur as well.
-
Many regulatory proteins target the stable association of the small ribosomal subunit with the mRNA. These factors function by steric hindrance (for example, iron-regulatory protein; IRP), by interfering with the eIF4F complex (for example, Maskin, Bicoid, Cup) or by as-yet-unknown, distinct mechanisms to control translation initiation (sex-lethal; SXL).
-
Other regulatory molecules modulate the joining of the large ribosomal subunit (hnRNP K and E1) or, potentially, post-initiation translation steps (miRNAs).
-
General translation factors can regulate the expression of specific mRNAs. An illustrative example is the stimulation of translation of the mRNA that encodes the GCN4 transcriptional activator by eIF2α phosphorylation.
Abstract
Translational control is widely used to regulate gene expression. This mode of regulation is especially relevant in situations where transcription is silent or when local control over protein accumulation is required. Although many examples of translational regulation have been described, only a few are beginning to be mechanistically understood. Instead of providing a comprehensive account of the examples that are known at present, we discuss instructive cases that serve as paradigms for different modes of translational control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuersten, S. & Goodwin, E. B. The power of the 3′ UTR: translational control and development. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 626–637 (2003).
Wickens, M., Goodwin, E., Kimble. J., Strickland S. & Hentze, M. in Translational control of gene expression (eds Sonenberg, N., Hershey, J. W. & Mathews, B. M. B.) 295 (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, USA, 2000).
Johnstone, O. & Lasko, P. Translational regulation and RNA localization in Drosophila oocytes and embryos. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 365–406 (2001).
Hershey, J. W. B. & Merrick, W. C. in Translational control of gene expression (eds Sonenberg, N., Hershey, J. W. & Mathews, B. M. B.) 33 (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, USA, 2000).
Pestova, T. V. et al. Molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7029–7036 (2001).
Preiss, T. & Hentze, M. W. Starting the protein synthesis machine: eukaryotic translation initiation. Bioessays 25, 1201–1211 (2003).
Lamphear, B. J., Kirchweger, R., Skern, T. & Rhoads R. E. Mapping of functional domains in eukaryotic protein synthesis initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) with picornaviral proteases. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21975–21983 (1995).
Asano, K. et al. Multiple roles for the C-terminal domain of eIF5 in translation initiation complex assembly and GTPase activation. EMBO J. 20, 2326–2337 (2001).
Wells, S. E., Hillner, P. E., Vale, R. D. & Sachs, A. B. Circularisation of mRNA by eukaryotic translation initiation factors. Mol. Cell 2, 135–140 (1998). The authors visualize the circularization of capped and polyadenylated RNA mediated by eIF4E, eIF4G and PABP by atomic force microscopy, and provide the first detailed example of molecular interactions that enable 5′–3′-end communication of mRNAs.
Kozak, M. Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene 299, 1–34 (2002).
Pestova, T. V. & Kolupaeva, V. G. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev. 16, 2906–2922 (2002).
Pestova, T. V., Borukhov, S. I. & Hellen, C. U. T. Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons. Nature 394, 854–859 (1998). Defines the role of eIF1 and eIF1A in translation initiation using a reconstituted translation-initiation system with highly purified factors and a reverse-transcription-based toe-printing assay.
Pestova, T. V. et al. The joining of ribosomal subunits in eukaryotes requires eIF5B. Nature 403, 332–335 (2000). Identification of a second GTP-dependent step in 80S ribosome formation, which shows that eIF5B is a ribosome-stimulated GTPase.
Shin, B. S. et al. Uncoupling of initiation factor eIF5B/ IF2 GTPase and translational activities by mutations that lower ribosome affinity. Cell 111, 1015–1025 (2002).
Hinnebusch, A. G. in Translational control of gene expression (eds Sonenberg, N., Hershey, J. W. & Mathews, B. M. B.) 185 (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, USA, 2000).
Rowlands, A. G, Panniers, R. & Henshaw, E. C. The catalytic mechanism of guanine nucleotide exchange factor action and competitive inhibition by phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 5526–5533 (1988).
de Haro, C., Mendez, R. & Santoyo, J. The eIF-2α kinases and the control of protein synthesis. FASEB J. 10, 1378–1387 (1996).
Dever, T. E. Gene-specific regulation by general translation factors. Cell 108, 545–556 (2002).
Gingras, A. C., Raught, B. & Sonenberg, N. eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 913–963 (1999).
Pause, A. et al. Insulin-dependent stimulation of protein synthesis by phosphorylation of 5′ cap function. Nature 371, 762–767 (1994). Reports the discovery of a new class of global translational regulators — the 4E-BPs.
Bushell, M. et al. Cleavage of polypeptide chain initiation factor eIF4GI during apoptosis in lymphoma cells: characterisation of an internal fragment generated by caspase-3-mediated cleavage. Cell Death Differ. 7, 628–636 (2000).
Marissen, W. E., Triyoso, D., Younan, P. & Lloyd, R. E. Degradation of poly(A)-binding protein in apoptotic cells and linkage to translation regulation. Apoptosis 9, 67–75 (2004).
Schneider, R. J. & Mohr, I. Translation initiation and viral tricks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 130–136 (2003).
Gray, N. K. & Hentze, M. W. Iron regulatory protein prevents binding of the 43S translation pre-initiation complex to ferritin and eALAS mRNAs. EMBO J. 13, 3882–3891 (1994).
Muckenthaler, M., Gray, N. K. & Hentze, M. W. IRP-1 binding to ferritin mRNA prevents the recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit by the cap-binding complex eIF4F. Mol. Cell 2, 383–388 (1998). Molecular explanation of translational regulation by the IRE/IRP system by showing that eIF4F bound to the cap structure fails to form the subsequent bridging interactions to recruit the small ribosomal subunit when IRP is bound to the IRE.
Goossen, B., Caughman, S. W., Harford, J. B., Klausner, R. D. & Hentze, M. W. Translational repression by a complex between the iron-responsive element of ferritin mRNA and its specific cytoplasmic binding protein is position-dependent in vivo. EMBO J. 9, 4127–4133 (1990).
Paraskeva, E., Gray, N. K., Schlager, B., Wehr, K. & Hentze, M. W. Ribosomal pausing and scanning arrest as mechanisms of translational regulation from cap-distal iron-responsive elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 807–816 (1999).
Stripecke, R., Oliveira, C. C., McCarthy, J. E. & Hentze, M. W. Proteins binding to 5′ untranslated region sites: a general mechanism for translational regulation of mRNAs in human and yeast cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5898–5909 (1994).
Mendez, R. & Richter, J. D. Translational control by CPEB: a means to the end. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 521–529 (2001).
Stebbins-Boaz, B., Cao, Q., de Moor, C. H., Mendez, R. & Richter, J. D. Maskin is a CPEB-associated factor that transiently interacts with elF-4E. Mol. Cell 4, 1017–1027 (1999). Reports the identification of the first 'message-specific' 4E-BP.
Nelson, M. R., Leidal, A. M. & Smibert, C. A. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J. 23, 150–159 (2004).
Wilhelm, J. E., Hilton, M., Amos, Q. & Henzel, W. J. Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz. J. Cell Biol. 163, 1197–1204 (2003).
Nakamura, A., Sato, K. & Hanyu-Nakamura, K. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev. Cell 6, 69–78 (2004).
Clark, I. E., Wyckoff, D. & Gavis, E. R. Synthesis of the posterior determinant Nanos is spatially restricted by a novel cotranslational regulatory mechanism. Curr. Biol. 10, 1311–1314 (2000).
Niessing, D., Blanke, S. & Jackle, H. Bicoid associates with the 5′-cap-bound complex of caudal mRNA and represses translation. Genes Dev. 16, 2576–2582 (2002).
Gebauer, F., Grskovic, M. & Hentze, M. W. Drosophila sex-lethal inhibits the stable association of the 40S ribosomal subunit with msl-2 mRNA. Mol. Cell 11, 1397–1404 (2003).
Grskovic, M., Hentze, M. W. & Gebauer, F. A co-repressor assembly nucleated by Sex-lethal in the 3′ UTR mediates translational control of Drosophila msl-2mRNA. EMBO J. 22, 5571–5581 (2003).
Gebauer, F., Corona, D. F., Preiss, T., Becker, P. B. & Hentze, M. W. Translational control of dosage compensation in Drosophila by Sex-lethal: cooperative silencing via the 5′ and 3′ UTRs of msl-2 mRNA is independent of the poly(A) tail. EMBO J. 18, 6146–6154 (1999).
Mazumder, B. & Fox, P. L. Delayed translational silencing of ceruloplasmin transcript in γ-interferon-activated U937 monocytic cells: role of the 3′ untranslated region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6898–6905 (1999).
Sampath, P., Mazumder, B., Seshadri, V. & Fox, P. L. Transcript-selective translational silencing by γ-interferon is directed by a novel structural element in the ceruloplasmin mRNA 3′ untranslated region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1509–1519 (2003).
Mazumder, B. et al. Regulated release of L13a from the 60S ribosomal subunit as a mechanism of transcript-specific translational control. Cell 115, 187–198 (2003). Reports a new role for a ribosomal protein in mRNA-specific translational control.
Mazumder, B., Seshadri, V., Imataka, H., Sonenberg, N. & Fox, P. L. Translational silencing of ceruloplasmin requires the essential elements of mRNA circularization: poly(A) tail, poly(A)-binding protein, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6440–6449 (2001).
Ostareck, D. H. et al. mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: hnRNP K and hnRNP E1 regulate 15-lipoxygenase translation from the 3′ end. Cell 89, 597–606 (1997).
Ostareck, D. H., Ostareck-Lederer, A., Shatsky, I. N. & Hentze, M. W. Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: the 3′ UTR regulatory complex controls 60S ribosomal subunit joining. Cell 104, 281–290 (2001). Identifies 60S ribosomal subunit joining as a regulated step in translation and shows that hnRNP K and E1 inhibit lipoxygenase mRNA translation by a mechanism that probably involves interference with one or more translation-initiation factors.
Hinnebusch, A. G. Translational regulation of yeast GCN4. A window on factors that control initiator-tRNA binding to the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21661–21664 (1997). An excellent summary of one of the most intensively studied models of translational control in eukaryotes.
Harding, H. P. et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 6, 1099–1108 (2000).
Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L. & Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854 (1993). References 47 and 48 are the first reports of a regulatory miRNA.
Wightman, B., Ha, I. & Ruvkun, G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 75, 855–862 (1993).
Carrington, J. C. & Ambros, V. Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science 301, 336–338 (2003).
Ambros, V. MicroRNA pathways in flies and worms: growth, death, fat, stress, and timing. Cell 113, 673–676 (2003).
Stark, A., Brennecke, J., Russell, R. B. & Cohen, S. M. Identification of Drosophila microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 1, 397–409 (2003).
Enright, A. J. et al. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 5, R1 (2003).
Zamore, P. D. Ancient pathways programmed by small RNAs. Science 296, 1265–1269 (2002).
Hutvagner, G. & Zamore, P. D. A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 297, 2056–2060 (2002). Shows that the degree of complementarity between the miRNA and the target mRNA critically influences whether an mRNA is subject to degradation or translational repression.
Zeng, Y., Yi, R. & Cullen, B. R. MicroRNAs and small interfering RNAs can inhibit mRNA expression by similar mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 19, 9779–9784 (2003).
Mourelatos, Z. et al. miRNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins containing numerous microRNAs. Genes Dev. 16, 720–728 (2002).
Olsen, P. H. & Ambros, V. The lin-4 regulatory RNA controls developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans by blocking LIN-14 protein synthesis after the initiation of translation. Dev. Biol. 216, 671–680 (1999).
Seggerson, K., Tang, L. & Moss, E. G. Two genetic circuits repress the Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-28 after translation initiation. Dev. Biol. 243, 215–225 (2002).
Lee, Y. et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 425, 415–419 (2003).
Hutvagner, G. et al. A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science 293, 834–838 (2001).
Ketting, R. F. et al. Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 15, 2654–2659 (2001).
Grishok, A. et al. Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing. Cell 106, 23–34 (2001).
Bernstein, E., Caudy, A. A., Hammond, S. M., Hannon, G. J. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature 409, 363–366 (2001).
Hammond, S. M., Bernstein, E., Beach, D. & Hannon, G. J. An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 404, 293–296 (2000).
Hammond, S. M., Boettcher, S., Caudy, A. A., Kobayashi, R. & Hannon, G. J. Argonaute2, a link between genetic and biochemical analyses of RNAi. Science 293, 1146–1150 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank J. Valcárcel and R. Cuesta for carefully reading this manuscript. F.G. is supported by grants from La Caixa Foundation and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology. M.W.H. gratefully acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the European Union and the Human Frontiers in Science Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- MICRO RNA
-
A non-coding RNA molecule of ∼21–23 nucleotides that inhibits mRNA expression.
- CAP STRUCTURE
-
A structure, which consists of m7GpppN (where m7G represents 7-methylguanylate, p represents a phosphate group and N represents any base), that is located at the 5′ end of eukaryotic mRNAs.
- POLY(A) TAIL
-
A homopolymeric stretch of usually 25–200 adenine nucleotides that is present at the 3′ end of most eukaryotic mRNAs.
- INTERNAL RIBOSOME–ENTRY SEQUENCE
-
(IRES). A structure that is located in the 5′ UTR or open reading frame of some mRNAs of cellular or viral origin. It mediates translation initiation independently of the cap structure by recruiting the ribosome directly to an internal position of the mRNA.
- UPSTREAM OPEN READING FRAME
-
(uORF). A small open reading frame that is located in the 5′ UTR of some mRNAs.
- PSEUDOKNOT
-
A RNA tertiary structure that is formed when the single-stranded loop in a hairpin structure base pairs with a complementary sequence outside of the hairpin.
- EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR
-
(eIF). A protein that mediates translation initiation on bulk mRNA.
- DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASE
-
An enzyme that unwinds RNA duplexes and contains the evolutionarily conserved motif DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) in the helicase core region.
- SCAFFOLD PROTEIN
-
A protein that serves as a platform for the assembly of other proteins.
- 4E-BINDING PROTEIN
-
(4E-BP). A protein that interacts with the cap-binding protein eIF4E and inhibits its association with eIF4G.
- POLYSOME
-
A string of multiple 80S ribosomes bound to an mRNA molecule.
- X-CHROMOSOME DOSAGE COMPENSATION
-
A process that balances the expression levels of X-linked genes in those organisms in which males and females contain a different number of X chromosomes.
- LARGE RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT PROTEIN L13A
-
A structural protein that binds to the outer surface of the large (60S) ribosomal subunit.
- CERULOPLASMIN
-
A glycoprotein secreted by the liver that oxidizes Fe2+ to Fe3+.
- RNase III
-
A family of endoribonucleases that cleave double-stranded RNA and have an important role in the maturation of ribosomal RNA, among other processes.
- MESSENGER RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN
-
(mRNP). A messenger RNA that is associated with proteins and that often represents translationally inactive (non-polysomal) mRNA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gebauer, F., Hentze, M. Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5, 827–835 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1488
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1488
This article is cited by
-
Drosophila eIF3f1 mediates host immune defense by targeting dTak1
EMBO Reports (2024)
-
Remodeling of the ribosomal quality control and integrated stress response by viral ubiquitin deconjugases
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Genome-wide screening for genetic variants in polyadenylation signal (PAS) sites in mouse selection lines for fatness and leanness
Mammalian Genome (2023)
-
Tandem repeats ubiquitously flank and contribute to translation initiation sites
BMC Genomic Data (2022)
-
Photocaged 5′ cap analogues for optical control of mRNA translation in cells
Nature Chemistry (2022)