Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Ethnic Considerations in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in Caucasian Versus Non-Caucasian Patients

  • Review
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty on patient satisfaction and complication rates. Traditional rhinoplasty techniques often overlook ethnic anatomical differences, leading to suboptimal aesthetic outcomes and higher revision rates. In contrast, individualised approaches aim to optimise both form and function by tailoring procedures to specific anatomical and cultural contexts.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, PROSPERO, DynaMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in April 2025. Seventeen comparative clinical studies (2003–2023) were included in a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251045319). Primary outcomes were patient-reported satisfaction, complication rates, and revision frequency. Secondary analyses assessed effectiveness of specific surgical techniques across major ethnic groups: Hispanic/Mestizo, African-American, Middle Eastern, Indian-American, Asian, and Caucasian. Statistical analyses used RevMan 5.4 with random-effects modelling and I2 for heterogeneity. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and AHRQ criteria.

Results

Ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty was associated with significantly greater patient satisfaction (SMD = 0.68 [95% CI 0.63–0.73]; p < 0.001). The highest satisfaction was observed in multi-ethnic (SMD = 0.76), African-American (0.71), and Middle Eastern (0.63) groups. Indian (0.58) and Asian (0.55) patients also showed favourable outcomes, while Caucasian patients had the lowest satisfaction (0.21). Tailored approaches resulted in lower complication (8.7%) and revision (5.3%) rates compared to conventional methods (17.4% and 12.1%). Heterogeneity was minimal (I2 = 0%), with no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusion

Ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty enhances patient satisfaction and safety across diverse populations. These findings support the need for culturally and anatomically informed surgical planning in modern aesthetic practice.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Vespa J, Medina L. Demographic turning points for the United States: population projections for 2020 to 2060. U.S. Census Bureau. 2018.

  2. Broer PN, Juran S, Liu YJ, et al. The impact of geographic, ethnic, and demographic dynamics on the perception of beauty. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):157–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maassarani D, Challita R, Zeaiter N, et al. Ethnic rhinoplasty: a middle east-centered patient satisfaction survey using the FACE-Q questionnaire. Cureus. 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel A, Most SP. Concepts of facial aesthetics when considering ethnic rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020;53(2):195–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein L. Surgical anatomy in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1975;8(3):549–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mafi AA, Shahverdiani R, Mafi P. Ideal soft tissue facial profile in Iranian males and females: clinical implications. World J Plast Surg. 2018;7(2):179–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghareeb FM, Nassar AT, Talaab AA, et al. Anatomically based optimization of outcomes in Middle Eastern rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(10):e1862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pourdanesh F, Tabrizi R, Vahedi R, et al. Ethnic rhinoplasty in Iranians: the oral and maxillofacial surgery experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(12):2568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niechajev I. Noses of the Middle East: variety of phenotypes and surgical approaches. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(7):1700–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slupchynskyj O, Gieniusz M. Rhinoplasty for African American patients: a retrospective review of 75 cases. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(4):232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parab SR, Khan MM. Do aesthetic average nasal parameters matter for rhinoplasty in India? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(3):2011–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhandari PS, Dhar S, Gulati A. Anthropometric analysis of linear parameters of the Indian nose: a cross-sectional study and comparison with literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(12):3421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gruber RP, Kuang A, Kahn D. Asian - American rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2004;24(5):423–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilci AA, Baser E, Verim A, et al. Outcomes of external septorhinoplasty in a Turkish male population. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;84(4):426–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Berger AS, Freitas RS, Malafaia O, et al. Prospective study of the surgical techniques used in primary rhinoplasty on the caucasian nose and comparison of the preoperative and postoperative anthropometric nose measurements. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;19(1):34–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rowe-Jones J, Van Wyk FC. Special considerations in Northern European primary aesthetic rhinoplasty. Fac Plast Surg. 2010;26(2):75–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Santos M, Monteiro D, Coutinho M, et al. Caucasian Mediterranean patients seeking rhinoplasty: anthropometric measurements and prevalence of major deformities. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(4):581–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Slupchynskyj O, Rahimi M. Revision rhinoplasty in ethnic patients: pollybeak deformity and persistent bulbous tip. Fac Plast Surg. 2014;30(4):477–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chisholm EJ, Hajioff D, Kotecha B. Influence of ethnicity on the frequency of nasal surgery. Rhinology. 2006;44(3):201–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pozzi M, Fadel C, Bolletta A, et al. Aesthetic rhinoplasty outcomes in diverse populations: a prospective multicenter study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;76(9):2456–63.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dias JP, Santos M, Sharafi M, et al. Nasal dorsum anatomy of major different ethnicities-surgical implications: a multicenter radiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;154(4):760–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saad A, Hewett S, Nolte M, et al. Ethnic rhinoplasty in female patients: the neoclassical canons revisited. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2018;42(2):565–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Geographic of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1986;10(4):191–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ofodile FA, Bokhari FJ, Ellis C. The black American nose. Facial Plast Surg. 1993;19(3):257–68.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cobo R. Mestizo rhinoplasty. Fac Plast Surg. 2003;19(3):257–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty and the male patient. Clin Plast Surg. 1991;18(4):751–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortiz-Monasterio F, Olmedo A. Rhinoplasty on the mestizo nose. Clin Plast Surg. 1977;4(1):89–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aung SC, Foo CL, Lee ST. Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the Oriental nose with a new classification of Oriental nasal types. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:109–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Won T, Jin HR. Revision rhinoplasty in Asians. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65:379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liang W, Sun S, Ma H, et al. The ideal nasion in Chinese: a preference analysis of the general population. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):2486–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel SM, Daniel RK. Indian American rhinoplasty: an emerging ethnic group. Plast Reconstr Surgl. 2012;129(3):519–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Porter JP. Non-Caucasian rhinoplasty: preoperative analysis. Fac Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2003;11(3):327–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chike-Obi CJ, Boahene K, Bullocks JM, et al. Tip nuances for the nose of African descent. Facial Plast Surg. 2012;28(2):194–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Peng GL, Nassif PS. Rhinoplasty in the African-American patient: anatomic considerations and technical pearls. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(1):255–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sajjadian A. Rhinoplasty in Middle Eastern patients. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(1):281–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Deeb R. Ethnically sensitive rhinoplasty. Fac Plast Surg. 2023;39(5):527–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gassner HG. Finesse in Caucasian endonasal rhinoplasty: the S.O.F.T. concept in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2020;53(2):213–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sherris DA, Fuerstenberg J, Danahey D, et al. Reconstruction of the nasal columella. Arch Fac Plast Surg. 2002;4(1):42–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Heiman AJ, Nair L, Kanth A, et al. Defining regional variation in nasal anatomy to guide ethnic rhinoplasty: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(8):2784–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Core Surgical Trainee, Department of Plastic Surgery, Swansea Bay University Hospital, Swansea, UK

    Yaldasadat Hashemipour

  2. Clinical Immunology Research Centre, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZAUMS), Zahedan, Iran

    Hosein Ali Danesh

Authors
  1. Yaldasadat Hashemipour
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hosein Ali Danesh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaldasadat Hashemipour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no Conflict of interest

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashemipour, Y., Danesh, H.A. Ethnic Considerations in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in Caucasian Versus Non-Caucasian Patients. Aesth Plast Surg 50, 1537–1546 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05189-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05189-w

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Yaldasadat Hashemipour View author profile