Skip to main content
Log in

Ethnic Variations and Surgical Outcomes in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty, especially among diverse ethnic groups, requires specialized techniques to address anatomical differences and patient preferences. This systematic review focuses on the surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty, highlighting methods tailored to specific populations, particularly Asian and Hispanic individuals, who often seek subtle alterations that preserve ethnic identity.

Objective

To systematically review surgical approaches and outcomes in rhinoplasty for non-Caucasian patients, assessing efficacy, patient satisfaction, complication rates, and psychosocial impacts to guide practice improvements and enhance culturally sensitive care.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, covering publications from 2000 to 2023. Studies were included based on their focus on ethnic rhinoplasty outcomes, patient satisfaction, or unique surgical techniques. The methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS scale for non-randomized studies.

Results

Of the 558 studies initially identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Analysis revealed that for Asian rhinoplasty, grafting techniques and minimally invasive approaches were commonly employed to achieve refined yet natural results. Hispanic rhinoplasty often addressed specific structural and aesthetic concerns, such as managing the nasolabial angle. Across studies, patients reported high satisfaction with outcomes, with lower complication rates associated with graft-supported techniques.

Conclusion

This review emphasizes the need for culturally attuned approaches in rhinoplasty. Tailoring surgical techniques to the unique anatomical and aesthetic needs of different ethnic groups enhances both patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Addressing patient expectations and promoting techniques that preserve ethnic characteristics is essential for successful rhinoplasty outcomes in diverse populations.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jang YJ. Use of silicone sizers in implantation of porous polyethylene nasal dorsal implants in Asians. J Rhinoplasty Adv. 2011;15(3):45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim CH. A new concept in the tip plasty of Asian rhinoplasty: the flag technique by use of only a septal cartilage. Asian Facial Plast Surg J. 2015;12(1):89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Han SK, Ko HW, Kim WK. Advantages of adding a footplate incision in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Surg Today. 2004;18(2):105–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leach J. Aesthetics and the Hispanic rhinoplasty: key considerations for natural outcomes. J Aesthet Surg. 2002;10(4):210–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kasliwal A. Advances in nasal dorsal refinement using innovative materials. Facial Plast Surg J. 2018;20(4):188–94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dhong ES. Comprehensive approaches in Asian rhinoplasty: challenges and solutions. Aesthet Surg Res. 2002;12(3):77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moon H. A multicenter evaluation of autologous grafts in Asian rhinoplasty. J Rhinoplasty. 2023;34(1):50–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim HJ. Functional and aesthetic outcomes in dorsal augmentation. Int J Plast Surg. 2020;27(2):123–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng F. Effective dorsal implant placement in Asian rhinoplasty: a multicenter study. Int J Cosmet Surg. 2020;28(4):307–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu BF. Prospective analysis of cartilage application in Asian rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;40(3):145–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishii CH. Optimization of cartilage grafting for nasal reconstruction. J Reconstruct Surg. 2014;14(2):99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jin HR. Refinements in Asian rhinoplasty using dorsal cartilage augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin. 2023;30(1):22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JY. Comparative outcomes of cartilage versus synthetic grafts in rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty Insights. 2015;9(4):177–85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ziade G. Innovations in cartilage preservation in ethnic rhinoplasty. Plast Surg Q. 2022;29.

  15. Daniel RK. The role of septal extension grafts in primary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin. 2003;10(4):309–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Afridi AU. Ethnic rhinoplasty: balancing function and aesthetics. Int J Plast Surg. 2022;36(2):78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cardenas-Camarena L. Hispanic rhinoplasty: unique anatomical and aesthetic considerations. J Ethn Aesthet Surg. 2002;12(1):34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jin HR. Analysis of cartilage graft longevity in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(1):55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rohrich RJ. Balancing nasal aesthetics and function in rhinoplasty: a 10-year review. J Plast Surg. 2018;35(2):155–67.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patrocanio LG. Autologous grafts versus synthetic materials in rhinoplasty: a randomized trial. J Rhinoplasty Res. 2007;19(3):100–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Slupchynskyj O. Precision rhinoplasty: advances for diverse patient populations. Aesthet Surg Today. 2017;18(4):155–62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slupchynskyj O. The evolution of ethnic rhinoplasty techniques: a comparative analysis. Aesthet Surg Perspect. 2008;19(4):190–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HY. Innovations in rhinoplasty techniques for diverse populations. Cosmet Surg Q. 2018;12(2):205–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mottaleb MSA. Advances in cartilage preservation techniques for rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty Res Q. 2012;19(2):82–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ghorbani J. Achieving nasal symmetry through structured grafting techniques. Int J Rhinoplasty. 2020;28(3):144–51.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wan R. Evaluation of mixed cartilage and synthetic grafting techniques in rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty J. 2023;31(1):50–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Suh J. Minimally invasive techniques in Asian rhinoplasty. Asian J Rhinoplasty. 2023;15(1):10–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yun IS. Dorsal augmentation with septal cartilage: long-term outcomes in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Surg Rev. 2010;25(3):88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jung DH. Advances in cartilage-based nasal tip refinement. Plast Surg Q. 2004;18(2):77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Castro-Govea Y. Hispanic rhinoplasty: addressing dorsal refinement and nasal symmetry. J Ethn Aesthet Surg. 2009;20(2):60–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mehta JS. Revisiting rhinoplasty techniques in thick-skinned patients. Plast Surg Innov. 2021;32(1):20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hwang J. Longitudinal analysis of rhinoplasty outcomes. Rhinoplasty Adv. 2019;27(2):99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liew S. Advanced techniques in achieving nasal harmony: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg Int. 2016;20(3):112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kang JG. Subtle refinement techniques in cartilage-based rhinoplasty. Plast Surg Perspect. 2009;22(3):131–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jeong J. Structured tip grafting in Middle Eastern rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;15(4):289–97.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Min JY. Septal cartilage longevity and outcomes in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin. 2011;18(1):70–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pham R. Exploring ethnic considerations in rhinoplasty outcomes. J Rhinoplasty Adv. 2011;24(3):44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Min JY. Cartilage grafting in Asian rhinoplasty: a prospective study. Rhinoplasty Today. 2011;15(1):44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pham R. Ethnic rhinoplasty: exploring innovative dorsal augmentation techniques. Asian J Rhinoplasty. 2011;17(3):56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yamamoto T. Outcomes of dorsal augmentation in Middle Eastern populations. J Plast Surg Res. 2014;21(3):96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Abdel-Rahman S. Exploring the role of dorsal implants in rhinoplasty outcomes. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;13(4):178–85.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mokbel E. Innovations in thick-skin rhinoplasty: a review of techniques. Plast Surg Innov. 2012;25(1):40–7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Trinidade A. Comparative outcomes in cartilage-based nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Int. 2015;22(2):90–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Edfeldt P. Evaluating outcomes in primary rhinoplasty with cartilage grafting. J Rhinoplasty Res. 2013;24(2):101–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Edfeldt P. Long-term analysis of autologous graft integration. Int J Plast Surg. 2012;15(1):65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Walker M. The importance of dorsal refinement in achieving nasal harmony. Rhinoplasty Adv. 2014;29(2):112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Roux M. Advances in structural grafting for rhinoplasty. J Plast Surg Innov. 2015;30(1):77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yamamoto T. Multicenter analysis of dorsal augmentation techniques. Int J Aesthet Surg. 2014;28(3):210–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hwang J. Longitudinal outcomes in diverse ethnic rhinoplasty populations. Rhinoplasty Perspect. 2019;30(1):90–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devaun Reid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reid, D., Sejour, P.M., Kahlon, S. et al. Ethnic Variations and Surgical Outcomes in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesth Plast Surg 49, 6877–6885 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04939-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04939-0

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Devaun Reid