Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2011 Feb;11(2):191–201. doi: 10.2174/187152011795255911

Manganese superoxide dismutase (Sod2) and redox-control of signaling events that drive metastasis

Nadine Hempel 1, Pauline M Carrico 2, J Andres Melendez 1,*
PMCID: PMC3902825  NIHMSID: NIHMS514345  PMID: 21434856

Abstract

Manganese superoxide dismutase (Sod2) has emerged as a key enzyme with a dual role in tumorigenic progression. Early studies were primarily directed at defining the tumor suppressive function of Sod2 based on its low level expression in many tumor types. It is now commonly held that loss of Sod2 expression is likely an early event in tumor progression allowing for further propagation of the tumorigenic phenotype resulting from steady state increases in free radical production. Increases in free radical load have also been linked to defects in mitochondrial function and metastatic disease progression. It was initially believed that Sod2 loss may propagate metastatic disease progression, in reality both epidemiologic and experimental evidence indicate that Sod2 levels increase in many tumor types as they progress from early stage non-invasive disease to late stage metastatic disease. Sod2 overexpression in many instances enhances the metastatic phenotype that is reversed by efficient H2O2 scavenging. This review evaluates the many sequelae associated with increases in Sod2 that impinge on the metastatic phenotype. The ability to use Sod2 to modulate the cellular redox-environment has allowed for the identification of redox-responsive signaling events that drive malignancy, such as invasion, migration and prolonged tumor cell survival. Further studies of these redox-driven events will help in the development of targeted therapeutic strategies to efficiently restrict redox-signaling essential for malignant progression.

INTRODUCTION

Sod2 expression during metastatic disease

While it has been known for some time that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in tumor initiation and progression, the mechanisms and causes of enhanced ROS accumulation during tumorigenesis remain an area of active investigation. Tumor cells often display enhanced intracellular ROS levels and have adapted to cope and potentially utilize these changes in ROS for their normal function. In turn, it has been shown that many tumor cells display significant changes in antioxidant enzyme expression profiles. Whether this results as a consequence of changes in ROS levels or contributes to a shift in redox balance remains to be determined. Here we will focus on one important antioxidant enzyme of the mitochondria, manganese superoxide dismutase (Sod2) and the growing evidence that enhanced expression of Sod2 is associated with metastatic progression of some cancer types. Sod2 is the major mitochondrial enzyme responsible for dismutation of superoxide (O2.−), which primarily arises due to electron leakage from the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Following dismutation by Sod2, the resultant hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a more stable ROS compared to O2.− and can easily diffuse throughout the cell, where it may be further metabolized by catalase or peroxidases. The role of Sod2 and its changes in gene expression during tumorigenicity have been areas of intense investigation, yet due to its somewhat conflicting expression profile in different cancers, as well as its differential action on mechanisms of tumorigenesis, the role for Sod2 as either a tumor suppressor or oncogene is still being determined. For the most part it appears that Sod2 expression in some primary tumors is suppressed, whereas expression increases in more aggressive tumors and during metastatic progression.

In 1979 Oberley and Buettner first summarized the role of Sod2 expression in cancer cells and hypothesized a tumor suppressor role for Sod2. Early studies by the late Dr. Larry Oberley showed that Sod2 expression was decreased in cancer versus normal tissues and that this shifts the redox balance of tumor cells [1] to a more pro-oxidative state. Microarray studies of tumor specimen as well as cell lines confirm that Sod2 levels are significantly decreased in many of the cancers previously investigated by Oberley and others. For example, studies from prostate and leukemia specimen overwhelmingly show decreases in Sod2 expression compared to normal tissue controls (Table 1). For reviews on the loss of Sod2 during tumorigenesis and potential mechanisms, we refer the reader to the following articles [1-3].

Table 1.

Changes in Sod2 mRNA levels from microarray studies of tumor specimens.

Cancer Type Number of studies reporting changes in Sod2 levels
Increase Decrease
Kidney 9 -
Brain & CNS 7 -
Head & Neck 7 -
Colorectal 5 -
Lymphoma 5 -
Testicular Seminoma and Teratoma 4 -
Gastric 3 -
Squamous Cell Skin Carcinoma 2 -
Pancreatic 2 -
Ovarian 1 -
Cervical 1 -
Esophageal 1 -
Liver 1 1
Breast Cancer 1 2
Other* 1 2
Sarcoma 3 2
Bladder Cancer - 1
Prostate - 2
Leukemia 1 5
Lung - -
Melanoma - -
Myeloma - -

Data was derived from a data base search on Oncomine.org, using a threshold p-value of <0.01 and >2-fold change in mRNA expression. – indicates no significant changes in Sod2 levels.

*

Other Cancers include: increase in Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, and decrease in Testicular Intratubular Germ Cell Neoplasia and Testicular Yolk Sac Tumor.

With more data from subsequent studies on different tumor types, as well as tumors with varying stages of metastatic disease, the profile of Sod2 expression is increasingly becoming a more complicated picture and suggests a dichotomous role for this antioxidant enzyme in tumorigenesis. It appears that changes in Sod2 expression are dependent on cancer type, as well as progression and/or aggressiveness of the disease. Table 1 lists the number of publicly available microarray studies, collected by the online resource Oncomine.org, that show significant changes in Sod2 expression at the mRNA level compared to normal controls. Studies from kidney, brain & CNS, head & neck, colorectal, lymphoma, testicular seminoma & teratoma, gastric, skin squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic cancers largely show increases in Sod2 expression when compared to normal tissues (Table 1). Independent studies have also shown increases in Sod2 expression in kidney cancer [4]; brain & CNS cancers [5-12]; head & neck, esophageal & oral squamous cell caricnomas [13-18]; mesothelioma & lung cancers [19-24]; gastric & colorectal cancers [13,25-31]; and pancreatic cancer [32]. In addition, many of these cancers display further increases in Sod2 expression during progression to metastatic disease. Examples of increases in Sod2 expression with increasing stage and grade of metastatic brain tumors from Oncomine.org microarray studies are shown in Figure 1. While data on patient outcome is not always readily available, it appears that in some cases enhanced Sod2 expression correlates with poor survival rate or recurrence. Independently published studies have shown increased Sod2 activity in advanced stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with regional metastases [16], enhanced Sod2 expression in malignant mesothelioma [21]; and an association of increases in Sod2 expression with metastatic progression of pancreatic [32] gastric [25] colorectal [33] and oral squamous cell carcinoma [18]. In contrast, it appears that Sod2 levels further decrease with increasing metastatic stage of prostate cancer (Figure 1), while a recent studies suggest that increased Sod2 expression is associated with neuroendorcrine differentiation of advanced stage prostate cancer [34] and increases in circulating Sod2 positively correlate with increased Gleason score of prostate cancer patients and tumor reoccurrence in the form of bone metastases [35].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Changes in Sod2 mRNA levels are associated with Grade, Metastatic Progression and Survival of Brain Cancer (A, [128], ***p<0.001, t-test; B, [9], p<0.05, t-test); Prostate Cancer (C,[129], *p<0.05, *** p<0.001, ANOVA, Tukey's Post test) and Breast Cancer (D. [130], *p<0.05, *** p<0.001, ANOVA, Tukey's Post test; E. [131], **p<0.01, t-test). Data was obtained from oncomine.org. Boxes represent the interquartile range marking the 25th to 75th percentile, midline indicates the median, whiskers mark the 10th and 90th percentile. Statistical Analysis was performed using GraphPadPrism software.

To complicate the picture, some cancers display little or no significant changes in Sod2 expression between normal and primary tumor specimen (eg. lung, melanoma, myeloma, ovarian, cervical and esophageal cancers; Table 1) or conflicting changes in expression dependent on study (sarcoma, liver and breast cancers; Table 1), yet data on some of these cancer types consistently show enhanced Sod2 expression that correlates with metastatic progression and poor outcome of disease. Studies from Oncomine.org include examples from metastatic lesions of breast, lung and bladder origin, where increased expression of Sod2 appears to correlate with increased stage and grade of these cancers (Figure 1, examples of metastatic breast shown). In metastatic bladder cancer Sod2 expression significantly correlates with stage (T stage, local invasion; and N stage, lymph node invasion) and grade of cancer [36] and we have shown that similar changes in Sod2 expression occur in a metastatic bladder cancer cell model [36]. Enhanced Sod2 expression appears to also correlate with metastatic progression in estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancers [37] and in malignant liver tumors when compared to benign tumor specimen [24].

Given these increases in Sod2 expression and potential correlation to outcome of the disease, researchers have suggested the use of Sod2 as a potential prognostic marker in a number of the above mentioned cancer types [12,14,17,18,22,26,28,33,38,39]. Further, some have suggested that changes in the circulating levels of Sod2 may also be useful as a diagnostic and predictive marker for certain cancer types [40,41].

It is now becoming clear that there is a dichotomous role for Sod2 during tumorigenisis. Sod2 may act as a tumor suppressor during the initial onset/proliferative stage of tumor initiation, yet once the tumor progresses to a more aggressive and invasive phenotype, Sod2 levels appear to positively correlate and contribute to enhanced metastatic behavior of cancer cells. Increased expression of Sod2 in metastatic cancer specimen, as well as in metastatic cell lines, appears to correlate with an increase in Sod2 activity, suggesting a functional role for this enzyme during metastatic progression [16,21,24,32,42]. However, many studies on patient samples do not include sufficient data on Sod2 activity, and it is therefore necessary to further establish that activity during metastatic progression positively correlates with enhanced Sod2 expression. For example, in Alzheimer's Disease it was shown that Sod expression was significantly increased in brains slices of afflicted patients, yet Sod activity was markedly reduced [43]. A recent manuscript by Shan et al. demonstrates that thioredoxin 1 (Trx1) expression is significantly enhanced in high grade prostate cancer specimen compared to low-grade samples, yet Trx1 activity is decreased in high grade tumors, due to enhanced oxidation and enzyme inactivation [44]. It has been reported that Sod2 transcription and post-transcriptional regulation account for a decrease in Sod2 activity following hyperoxic exposure in rat lungs[45]. A recent proteomic study identified two different Sod2 “spots” from medulloblastoma cell line protein extracts by 2-D electrophoresis, which were due to 2-oxo-histidine modifications of His-30 and His-31 on one of these Sod2 proteins[46]. It is not clear whether this modification impacts activity, however evidence from site-directed mutagenesis studies suggests that His-30 is an important amino acid involved in the hydrogen bond network in the catalytic domain of Sod2. A His-30-Asp substitution resulted in more efficient dismutation of O2.− by Sod2, due to inability of this mutant to be product-inhibited within the catalytic site[47,48]. Another known mechanism for inhibition of Sod2 activity is tyrosine nitration [49]. While evidence from the studies mentioned in the previous paragraphs appear to show that expression and enhanced Sod2 activity correlate in metastatic lesions, it remains to be investigated whether activity of Sod2 is altered in metastatic disease due to mechanisms such as nitration or oxidation.

With the advent of genome sequencing and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) a great deal of interest arose from the discovery of SNPs in the Sod2 gene. The Sod2 polymorphisms that emerged were soon followed by studies indicating their association with cancer risk. The primary SNP associated with cancer risk was Val(16)Ala polymorphism in the mitochondrial signal peptide. Interestingly, the risk associated SNP (Ala) has been shown to be efficiently expressed and localized to mitochondria [50]. It has been suggested that increased epidemiologic cancer risk associated with the Val(16)Ala polymorphism may be attributed to its enhanced activity that alters the cellular redox environment to increase steady-state [H2O2] [51], The Sod2-dependent shift in the cellular redox-state increases matrix turnover, inhibits cell death and drives redox-signaling. We refer the reader to a review by Bag and Bag [51] for a comprehensive discussion on this topic.

How do Sod2 levels change during metastasis?

Since much of the early research centered on the loss of Sod2 expression in a number of cancer types and its role as a tumor suppressor, more research has focused on the mechanisms that regulate its transcriptional down-regulation during tumorigenesis. Loss of Sod2 expression during tumorigenesis has been attributed to hypermethylation of its promoter [52,53], histone modification of the Sod2 gene in breast cancer [54] and potential chromosome instability of chromosome 6 during progression to cancer [2].

In this review, however, we explore the role of enhanced expression of Sod2 during metastatic progression and pro-metastatic signaling events (discussed below). A number of studies are starting to explore potential mechanisms for this dysregulation of Sod2 expression. We will only briefly touch on potential mechanisms that lead to enhanced Sod2 expression in aggressive/metastatic cancers, which include increases in ROS levels [55], changes in cytokine levels and transcription factor expression during tumorigenesis, that regulate the Sod2 gene promoter. We refer the reader to the referenced articles for more detailed information.

An altered transcription factor profile in cancer cells may contribute to increases in Sod2. NFκB has been shown to directly act on and induce activity of the Sod2 promoter. Resistance to chemotherapy and radiation has been attributed to the activation of the NFκB pathway and subsequent induction of Sod2 transcription in a number of cancer cell lines [56,57]. Interestingly, a recent study by Dhar et al., points to a bidirectional regulation of Sod2 by p53, which was shown to be dependent on NFκB and Sp1[58]. Low levels of p53 increase Sod2 transcription by enhancing NFκB binding to the Sod2 promoter. Conversely, high p53 levels likely prevent binding of Sp1 to the Sod2 promoter, inhibiting its constitutive activation. The authors conclude that high levels of p53 prevent Sod2 expression to enhance apoptosis, whereas low levels of p53 may enhance Sod2 levels to promote a pro-survival state. Similarly, it has been reported that p53 −/− fibroblasts have high Sod2 expression and activity, enhancing their resistance to oxidative stress[59]. This may explain the enhanced Sod2 expression observed during tumorigenesis, as p53 is one of the tumor suppressor genes frequently mutated and inactivated in a number of cancers. It should be noted that p53 may also regulate Sod2 activity independent of transcription. It has been shown that p53 can translocate to the mitochondria, following cellular stress signals such as treatment with the carcinogen 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)[60]. Here it can directly interact and inhibit activity of Sod2, which the authors show to be an important step in p53-mediated apoptosis following TPA treatment.

Oxygen free radicals and ionizing radiation have been shown to induce Sod2 expression in a TNFα-dependent manner, another transcription factor known to regulate transcription of Sod2 gene [61-63]. Changes in TNFα levels have been associated with enhanced metastatic disease [64,65]. A recent study suggests that the dichotomous expression of Sod2 in breast cancer might be explained by a novel transcriptional repressor DDB2 (damaged DNA binding 2), which leads to a loss of acetylated H3 histones and the decrease in Sp1 binding to the Sod2 promoter in Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive cells, like MCF-7 [66]. However, in ER negative breast cancer cell lines, such as MDA-MB231, high levels of Sod2 have been proposed to be due to a lack of inhibition by this transcription factor [66]. In another breast cancer cell model, T47D, Sod2 expression has been shown to be under the influence of Progestin [67].

Another possible explanation for the increase in Sod2 expression during tumorigenesis comes from a recent paper that shows a decrease in miRNA222 expression in an invasive squamous cell carcinoma cell line [68]. Interestingly this miRNA targets both Sod2 and MMP-1 for down regulation. We and others have shown that Sod2, via increased H2O2 can result in enhanced MMP-1 expression (see later chapter). Knockdown of miRNA 222 could therefore lead to an increase in MMP-1 via direct action on the MMP-1 gene and through indirect up regulation via Sod2 [68].

We and others are interested in the consequences of enhanced Sod2 during metastatic progression, and how this may influence intracellular ROS levels to manipulate pro-metastatic signaling events. While much of this research is still in it's infancy we aim to provide evidence from recent studies to address the role of Sod2 and ROS during metastasis.

How does Sod2 influence tumorigenicity and metastatic progression?

The pioneering work of Oberley and Buettner opened a decade of enlightenment in the field of redox-biology and cancer. It was originally held that enforced Sod2 expression decreased proliferation of a wide array of tumor cells, both in vitro and vivo. These include human melanoma, glioma, prostate and breast cancer cell lines, SV-40 transformed fibrosarcoma cells and mouse fibrosarcoma and JB6 epithelial cells [69,70]. However, through the years the impact of molecular Sod2 enforcement on tumor progression has evolved. Clinically, studies have shown that tumors which display enhanced Sod2 expression are also less proliferative, but resistant to apoptosis [11,22] and in some cases no change in tumorigenesis is observed [71]. However, given the fact that Sod2 levels appear to increase during metastatic progression, we and others began to investigate the role Sod2 may play in signaling events that regulate metastatic spread. Using a fibrosarcoma cell model system Sod2 expression was shown to slow proliferation of HT1080 cells, with a concomitant increase in both the invasive and migratory phenotypes that is reversed by efficient H2O2 scavenging [72]. Changes in invasion are accompanied by changes in matrix metalloproteinase expression and matrix turnover and increases in metastatic lesions using the tail vein model metastases model [73]. In hamster cheek pouch cancer model Sod2 expression increased invasiveness that was partially abrogated by catalase co-expression [74]. We have also observed a similar phenotype in metastatic bladder cancer cells that is also tempered by catalase expression [36]. Removal of H2O2 also results in decreased clonogenic activity and VEGF expression [36]. Below we describe a number of pro-metastatic phenotypes that are driven by enforced Sod2 expression, and postulate on the potential mechanisms by which Sod2 may be regulating these events.

Sod2–mediated Mechanisms that regulate Metastasis

Matrix Metalloproteinases and Invasion

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are Zn2+ and Ca2+ dependent endopeptidases involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover. To date, 23 known human MMPs have been identified; many of these share a five domain architecture comprising of a signal peptide, prodomain region, catalytic domain, hinge region and the hemopexin domain. Based upon their substrate specificity and structural differences, the MMPs are broadly classified into five groups – collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins and membrane-type MMPS (MT-MMPs). MMPs that differ from the general five-domain structure are: gelatinases (MMP-2 and 9), which have a fibronectin domain present within the catalytic domain; matrilysins (MMP-7 and 26), which lack the hinge and hemopexin domain; and MT-MMPs that have a transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail. All MMPs are secreted as zymogens into the extracellular space with the exception of MT-MMPs, which have a furin recognition sequence at the end of prodomain region that allows for MT-MMPs intracellular activation [75].

In tissues, MMP levels are extremely low and strictly regulated due to their ability to cleave a wide variety of substrates as they modulate many physiological processes including wound healing, cellular growth, embryogenesis, immune surveillance and bone remodeling [76]. Elevated MMP levels have been associated with a variety of pathological conditions such as rheumatoid and osteo-arthritis, lung emphysema, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's, and cancer. Overexpression of MMPs by tumor cells and/or stromal cells infiltrating the tumor can lead to the remodeling and degradation of the extracellular matrix and basement membranes, subsequent tumor cell invasion and metastasis[77]. Similarly, Sod2 mediated increases in cellular oxidant/anti-oxidant ratios are directly correlated with tumor progression, angiogenesis and migration and invasion. Zhang et al. (2002) demonstrated that overexpression of Sod2 in estrogen-dependent human breast cancer MCF-7 cells resulted in activation of MMP-2 expression and a corresponding increase in ROS [78]. Co-expression of catalase or glutathione peroxidase in the Sod2 overexpressing cells reversed this effect. Conversely, in the highly metastatic estrogen-independent breast cancer MDA-MB231 and SKBR3 cells, basal Sod2 levels are significantly higher as compared to the MCF-7 cells, with catalase and peroxiredoxin 3 expression significantly lower [79]. This augmented expression of Sod2 is associated with increased MMP-9 activity and greater invasiveness both of which are reduced by expression of anti-sense Sod2 RNA or treatment of the cells with the H2O2 scavengers NAC or pyruvate. These studies support that Sod2-mediated H2O2 production result in MMP dysregulation and subsequent metastasis.

Our group has demonstrated that overexpression of Sod2 in HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells significantly enhanced migration and invasion both in vitro and in vivo [72]. The severity of invasion was directly correlated to the Sod2 levels; HT1080 cells expressing high levels of Sod2-GFP exhibit greater invasiveness, a loss of focal adhesions and an increase in lung metastasis as compared to cells expressing low levels of Sod2-GFP. In tumor cells isolated from pulmonary metastases, those that expressed high levels of Sod2-GFP exhibited greater motility when examined by time-lapse microscopy. Concomitant increases in MMP-1 levels that also correlated with Sod2 levels were observed. The dependence of MMP-1 expression and the metastatic phenotypes associated with high Sod2 expression were abrogated upon co-expression with catalase targeted to the mitochondria.

The ability of Sod2 overexpression to modulate invasion is not restricted to HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells and was also observed in 253J transitional bladder carcinoma cells [72]. Similar to the HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells, co-expression of catalase in the 253J bladder carcinoma cells reversed the severity of the invasive phenotype. The highly metastatic bladder cancer cell line 253J-BV, which was derived from the 253J-P parental cell line, exhibited enhanced expression and activity of Sod2 as compared to the parental cells [36,80]. The increase in Sod2 expression was accompanied by a significant decrease in catalase activity, resulting in a net increase in H2O2 production in the 253J-BV cell line. Expression of MMP-9 was upregulated in the metastatic line and was attenuated by overexpression of catalase. Similarly, expression of catalase effectively reduced the clonogenic activity of 253J-BV cells.

Mechanistically, the regulation of MMP-1 by Sod2 seems to be mediated in part at least, at the level of transcription [81-85,85]. Based upon promoter conformation, MMPs have been categorized into three groups [84]. MMPs in group 1 have promoters that contain a TATA box in the −30 bp region with a proximal Activator Protein-1 (AP-1 site) at −70 bp (MMP-1, 3, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 19 and 26). Members in group 1 are transcriptionally activated following IL-1, TNF-α and phorbol ester treatment [86]. MMPs in group 2 have a TATA box without an AP-1 binding site (MMP-8, 11 and 21) whereas MMPs in group 3 lack all of the above elements (MMP-2, 14 and 28) [84]

Regulation of MMP-1 expression by Sod2 is influenced by a genetic variation in the MMP-1 promoter [73,82,83]. We have demonstrated that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) located at −1607 bp, creates an Ets family transcription factor binding site of the sequence 5′-GGAT-3′ by the insertion of a guanine base (G) and confers Sod2-dependent MMP-1 promoter activity [73]. In HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells, Sod2 overexpression also increases the mRNA levels of MMPs -2, -3, -7, -10, -9, -11, however, we have not yet identified promoter elements responsible [73]. Ets transcription factors normally do not bind DNA alone, but preferentially form coactivator complexes with transcription factors, such as AP-1. The Ets and AP-1 coactivating complex may also play a critical role in regulating the expression of various MMP family members, particulary that of MMP-1 [87]. The protooncoproteins Fos and Jun, which comprise the AP-1 complex, can homo or heterodimerize and bind its cognate consensus sequence (TGACTCA) in the regulatory domains of many genes including various MMP family members [88].

Numerous reports indicate that transcription factors important for MMP-1 expression are sensitive to redox-activation that occurs, in part, through activation of the MAPK family members ERK1/2 and JNK [89-91]. We have established that JNK confers redox-sensitivity to the MMP-1 promoter while both ERK and/or JNK are required for maximal basal promoter activity and the expression of AP-1 and Ets-1 [82]. In addition, both c-Jun and Ets-1 are recruited to the region of the MMP-1 SNP in response to alterations in the steady state production of H2O2.

Other lines of evidence suggest that H2O2-generated by the Sod2 is important to enhanced expression of MMP-1. Scharffetter-Kochanek and co-workers demonstrated that overexpression of Sod2 in dermal fibroblasts caused a profound increase in the expression of MMP-1 when superoxide was provided to the cells [92]. The investigators established that the induction of MMP-1 is due to the increase in the production of H2O2 as a result of the dismuting function of Sod2. This is further supported by work from our group that indicates binding of Ets-1 to the MMP-1 promoter and sustained JNK signaling requires the enzyme activity of Sod2. Furthermore, Sod2 is sufficient and required for the induction of MMP-1 and potentially other MMP family members via the H2O2-dependent activation of MAPK signaling [73,81,82].

Redox sensitive metastatic signaling networks: regulation of phosphatases

While we have extensively shown that enhanced expression of Sod2 leads to changes in MMP expression, our lab is interested in the mechanisms by which Sod2 expression can influence other pro-metastatic signaling event, potentially as a consequence of changing the redox environment of metastatic cancer cells. While Sod2 expression has been characterized to inhibit proliferation in some tumor cell types, an Sod2-dependent change in redox state appears to promote pro-migratory and -invasive signaling events.

ROS can act as second messengers via the oxidation and inactivation of Phosphatases. The active site cysteine residues responsible for phosphoryl transfer are particularly susceptible to oxidation at physiological pH, due to their low pKa (For review see [93]). This oxidation is reversible and dependent on the thiol status of cells and can result in significant changes in cellular signaling.

PTEN (Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog) is a dual protein and lipid phosphatase that has been extensively studied as a tumor suppressor gene. Loss or functional mutants of PTEN are associated with a number of cancers and poor prognosis [94]. The lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN results in dephosporylation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(4,5)P2, essentially regulating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3) Kinase signaling pathway by limiting PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 levels. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 is an important regulatory lipid, functions of which range from involvement in migration to angiogenisis. Redox dependent changes of the PI3-kinase pathway have been attributed to the reversible oxidation and inactivation of PTEN [95]. We have found that HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells that express Sod2 display more oxidation of this phosphatase than control transfected cells [96]. Further, oxidation of PTEN can be reversed by catalase expression, potentially implicating an increase in H2O2 as the primary ROS involved. PTEN oxidation is enhanced in the metastatic cell line, 253J-BV, which displays an increase in endogenous Sod2 expression, low catalase expression and an accompanying increase in H2O2 levels, when compared to it's non-metastatic parental line 253J-P (Hempel, Ye and Melendez, unpublished data). In the HT-1080 Sod2 over-expression model enhanced PTEN oxidation leads to a redistribution of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to the membrane, and leads to enhanced Akt signaling and increased angiogenesis, which were all Sod2 dependent [96].

We and others are actively investigating how increases in mitochondrial Sod2 and potential shifts in steady state [H2O2] lead to oxidation of phosphatases in membrand and cytosolic compartments.. While largely unknown, possibilities include the ability of oxidants to diffuse from the mitochondria to broad areas within the cell and/or the physical distribution of mitochondria. Mitochondria are often localized to leading edges of migrating cells, presumably to provide an energy source. Whether this also reflects site specific increases in mitochondrial ROS at the membrane remains to be elucidated. The importance of oxidants influencing cellular distribution of signaling players is highlighted by preliminary data from our laboratory. We have found that the oxidized pool of PTEN is recruited away from the membrane, it's primary site of action, and more abundantly found throughout the cytosol (Hempel and Melendez, unpublished data). This suggests that oxidation not only leads to a decrease in activity, but a change in cellular localization of this phosphatase.

Enhanced PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 distribution to the leading edge of cells has been implicated in regulating directionality and migration [97]. It is possible that cell surface accumulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 in Sod2 over-expressing cells contributes to their enhanced migratory phenotype. Evidence from PTEN mutagenesis studies however suggest that some of the metastatic regulatory properties of PTEN may not be solely due to its lipid phosphatase activity. Leslie and colleagues have shown that the protein tyrosine phosphatase activity of PTEN negatively regulates epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) transition [98]. Whether shifts in the Sod2-mediated oxidation of PTEN also drive EMT remains to be established. However, evidence from TGF-β induced EMT in human renal epithelial cells, suggests that Sod2 expression is down regulated during this transition [99]. Nonetheless, Sod2-mediated redox shift enhances Akt signaling. Sod2 expressing cells increase their angiogenic activity, a key contributor to metastatic spread and tumor growth [96]. Enhanced angiogenesis was accompanied by Sod2-dependent increases in VEGF expression [96]. The Sod2-dependent angiogenic switch was reversed by catalase expression, suggesting a role for H2O2 in this process. In 253J-BV cells, which display endogenously high Sod2 levels, we have similarly shown that enhanced VEGF levels and MMP-9 levels are dependent on a high intracellular H2O2 millieu [36]. Again, catalase expression could abrogate expression of these pro-metastatic genes.

Other phosphatases involved in pro-migratory signaling have similarly been shown to be redox regulated. We have investigated the role of Sod2 expression on changes in Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) signaling and found that the FAK-signaling cascade is activated in cells with high Sod2 expression. FAK signaling has also been shown to be H2O2-dependent, as catalase co-expression could reverse this effect, mediated via oxidation of phosphatase PTPN12 (Hempel and Melendez, unpublished data). Similar to Sod2, expression of Lysyl oxidase (LOX) has been shown to induce migration in a H2O2 dependent manner [100]. It was shown that FAK and Src activation were increased in LOX transfected breast cancer cells and catalase could abrogate the effects on migration and phosphorylation of the pro-migratory signaling kinases.

Other phosphatases that may be regulated due to a Sod2-dependent altered redox status likely include the Map Kinase phosphatases (MKP) that regulate MAPK signaling. MKPs are similarly sensitive to redox-dependent inactivation and this oxidation participates in the senescence-associated increase in MMP-1 expression [101]. MKPs are known targets of oxidation which leads to enhanced proteasomal degradation [102]. It is exciting to speculate that a similar signaling network participates in the Sod2-mediated increase in MMP expression in tumor cells.

Protection from Apoptosis

Many studies have shown that Sod2 is an important enzyme that protects cells from radiotherapy induced apoptosis. Here the action of Sod2 has primarily been attributed to it's antioxidant activity, rather than shifting the redox balance to a pro-H2O2 state. It has been shown that Sod2 stabilizes the mitochondrial membrane and leads to decreased caspase3 activation when cancer cells are treated with ionizing radiation, compared to cells that lack high Sod2 expression [103]. In addition Sod2 may inhibit tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis by inhibiting cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO release [104]. The authors hypothesize that within metastatic tumor cells the high levels of mitochondrial ROS, which normally drive release of Smac/DIABLO, are neutralized by Sod2, to prevent apoptosis. The high levels of Sod2 in tumor cells are therefore detrimental to chemo- and radiation therapy and investigators have proposed the use of Sod2 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy to radiation.

Wong and Goeddel were first to report that Sod2 was induced in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-1, as a protective mechanism from cytokine induced cell death [105,106]. Enforced Sod2 expression has been shown to confer resistance to numerous apoptotic stimuli [107-110]. The antiapoptotic effects of Sod2 are attributed to its dismuting activity. Recent work suggests that increases in steady state [H2O2] resulting from the overexpression of Sod2 are responsible for restricting TNF induced apoptotic cell death [111]. Regardless, of mechanism of protection afforded by Sod2 overexpression it does not precisely fit its role as a tumor suppressor as it would serve to prolong tumor survival and resistance to chemotherapeutic strategies. Recent work indicates radiation-resistance of cancer stem cells is attributed to their increased free radical scavenging capacity [112]. Chemoresistance of urothelial carcinoma cancer stem cells is associated with a high level expression of Sod2 [113,114]. Enhanced ROS scavenging confers genoprotection and allows cancer stem cells the unique ability to colonize new sites and survive after chemo- or radiation therapy. Thus, increased Sod2 expression may promote cancer stem cell survival and subsequent metastases.

Conclusions

It has been more than 30 years since Oberley and Buettner made the connection between low enzymatic Sod2 activity and cancer [1]. The idea that loss of Sod2 would potentiate tumorigenesis was well founded principally due to the wealth of information linking oxidants to tumor promotion [115]. This early observation has stood the test of time and it is now clear that in many tumor types suppression of Sod2 is regulated at both the genetic and epigenetic level [54,116]. While loss of Sod2 sensitizes tumor cells to free radicals associated with both radiation and chemotherapeutic it is equally not surprising that metastatic cancers that resist traditional ionizing and chemotherapies display an increase dismuting capacity. Why this increase is primarily restricted to Sod2 is not clear? Sod2 serves to preserve mitochondrial integrity but this is not likely the case as loss of mitochondrial genome integrity precedes progression to metastatic disease and is associated with increased ROS production [117]. Thus, increases in Sod2 levels may help cope with increased metabolic oxidant production. Alternatively, metastatic tumors cells are continuously exposed to inflammatory stimuli which can drive Sod2 expression. While possible, this does not explain the high level expression of Sod2 in isolated metastatic tumor cell types. Thus, many metastatic tumor cell types are programmed for high level Sod2 expression independent of inducing stimuli. There may be countless reasons for the increased Sod2 that is associated with a diverse array of malignant lesions and metastatic tumor cell lines. We feel it is the resulting consequences of increased Sod2 expression that further propagate the malignant phenotype as discussed in detail on the preceding pages and outlined in Figure 2. So far the pro-metastatic profile associated with increases in Sod2 expression has been attributed to increases in steady state [H2O2]. H2O2 can restrict the activity of many protein tyrosine phosphatase family members leading to an inherent increase in basal kinase activity. Our studies have established that Sod2-mediated increases in [H2O2] lead to oxidative inactivation of PTEN, Map kinase phosphatases and PTPN12 that play an important role in restricting invasion/migration, matrix turnover, cell proliferation, angiogenesis and cell survival. It is likely that elevated steady state [H2O2] resulting from Sod2 impact a broad array of signaling networks all of which exacerbate the malignant phenotype. The fact that many or all of these malignant properties are reversed by catalase co-expression makes them amenable to targeted and precise antioxidant intervention.

Figure 2. Pro-metastatic signaling pathways regulated by Sod2.

Figure 2

Enhanced expression of Sod2 in tumor cells have been linked with increased expression and activity of Matrix Metalloproteinases, leading to enhanced matrix degradation and potentially enhanced release of cytokines and growth factors, which further enhance signaling via kinases. ECM degradation aids a tumor cell's ability to leave the primary tumor and invade through the basement membrane. Enhanced H2O2 production following Sod2 expression has been linked to increased angiogenesis and migration, via the inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), subsequently enhancing kinase signaling, such as the PI3Kinase and FAK signaling cascades. Enhanced Sod2 expression has been directly linked to tumor cell radio and chenoresistance, likely due to it's dismuting activity, however it is possible that this may be further enhanced via Sod2's role in regulation of redox signaling.

Interestingly, Oncomine data mining revealed that catalase levels are often decreased in a number of cancer types and expression appears to decrease further with progression to metastatic disease (Oncomine.org)[118]. Catalase levels are negatively regulated by a number of mechanisms, including oxidant dependent promoter hypermethylation [119], phosphorylation and consequential proteosomal degradation[120]. One could speculate that an increase in Sod2 activity and a concomitant decrease in catalase activity may further shift the steady state level of [H2O2] within tumor cells.

Recent studies have shown that Nox4 levels are increased in tumors of the breast, ovary and melanoma, and that this enhanced expression leads to an increased tumorigenic phenotype[121,122]. Further, Graham et al. reported that this enhanced Nox4 dependent tumorigenicity is dependent on Nox4 localization to the mitochondria and a concomitant increase in mitochondrial ROS production [121]. Whether an increase in mitochondrial Nox4 levels within metastatic tumor cells provides the source for enhanced O2.− production, which are consequentially rapidly dismuted by Sod2 within these cells, thereby resulting in a change in [H2O2] levels, remains to be elucidated.

While we have experimental evidence indicating that steady state [H2O2] levels increase in response to Sod2 expression, the exact biochemical rational for this shift is beyond the scope of this review and we refer the reader to reviews by Dr. Gary Buettner and Dr. Irwin Fridovich on this topic

The differences in pro- and anti-oxidant activity of Sod2 may also be related to dose dependent effects of Sod2 expression. For example, Wang et al. reported that Sod2 has a biphasic role on Hypoxia Inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) regulation. Low level increases in Sod2 expression (2-6-fold) in MCF-7 breast cancer cells suppressed HIF-1α accumulation under hypoxic conditions[123]. The same authors later showed that this suppression was due to the dismuting activity of Sod2, as accumulation of O2.− following Sod2 knock-down was able to enhance HIF-1α levels[124]. On the contrary, when Sod2 was expressed at levels higher than 6-fold, HIF-1α levels increased in a H2O2 dependent manner, as peroxide removal from the mitochondria could reverse this effect[125]. We did not observe these biphasic effects of Sod2 expression on migration of HT-1080 cells. Low levels of Sod2 expression (2.5-fold increase in Sod2 activity) were able to drive migration of HT-1080 cells and additional increases in Sod2 expression lead to further enhancement of this migratory phenotype[126]. However, we have observed a biphasic role for Sod2 in the expression of the cytokine IL1α. At low Sod2 concentrations IL1α transcript levels are decreased [127], yet at higher Sod2 levels IL1α expression is H2O2-dependent.

There is a need to further our understanding of these complex biochemical mechanisms that govern the pro-oxidative and anti-oxidative nature of Sod2 during tumorigenesis. This knowledge will shed light on the roles of different oxidant species within tumor cells, as well as the consequences of altering antioxidant enzyme levels such as Sod2. It will also aid in the development of more targeted antioxidant and Sod2 mimetic therapies, considering that certain Sod2 mimetics may exert both pro- and anti-oxidative actions within tumor cells (review by Ines Batinic-Haberle in this issue). In addition, it is important to keep in mind that cancer stem cells bolster their free radical scavenging capacity for survival. Thus, it is not surprising that nutritional antioxidant supplementation has failed in cancer prevention studies as they have broad ranging impact and serve to scavenge all oxidants regardless of whether they are detrimental or beneficial to tumor cell survival. The advent of specific synthetic free radical scavengers which do not give rise to free radical propagating species may hold great promise in treatments targeted at metastatic disease.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant NIH R01, AG031067 (J. Andres Melendez) and F32CA13465, K99CA143229 (Nadine Hempel). We apologize to authors whose work is not cited in this review because of space constraints.

Reference List

  • 1.Oberley LW, Buettner GR. Role of superoxide dismutase in cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1979;39(4):1141–1149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bravard A, Sabatier L, Hoffschir F, Ricoul M, Luccioni C, Dutrillaux B. SOD2: a new type of tumor-suppressor gene? Int. J Cancer. 1992;51(3):476–480. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Borrello S, De Leo ME, Galeotti T. Defective gene expression of MnSOD in cancer cells. Mol. Aspects Med. 1993;14(3):253–258. doi: 10.1016/0098-2997(93)90012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soini Y, Kallio JP, Hirvikoski P, Helin H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Kang SW, Tammela TL, Peltoniemi M, Martikainen PM, Kinnula VL. Oxidative/nitrosative stress and peroxiredoxin 2 are associated with grade and prognosis of human renal carcinoma. APMIS. 2006;114(5):329–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cobbs CS, Levi DS, Aldape K, Israel MA. Manganese superoxide dismutase expression in human central nervous system tumors. Cancer Res. 1996;56(14):3192–3195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tews DS. Cell death and oxidative stress in gliomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1999;25(4):272–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.1999.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhong W, Yan T, Lim R, Oberley LW. Expression of superoxide dismutases, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase in glioma cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27(11-12):1334–1345. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00181-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haapasalo H, Kylaniemi M, Paunul N, Kinnula VL, Soini Y. Expression of antioxidant enzymes in astrocytic brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 2003;13(2):155–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2003.tb00015.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.French PJ, Swagemakers SM, Nagel JH, Kouwenhoven MC, Brouwer E, van der Spek P, Luider TM, Kros JM, van den Bent MJ, Sillevis Smitt PA. Gene expression profiles associated with treatment response in oligodendrogliomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65(24):11335–11344. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jarvela S, Bragge H, Paunu N, Jarvela T, Paljarvi L, Kalimo H, Helen P, Kinnula V, Soini Y, Haapasalo H. Antioxidant enzymes in oligodendroglial brain tumors: association with proliferation, apoptotic activity and survival. J Neurooncol. 2006;77(2):131–140. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-9030-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nordfors K, Haapasalo J, Helen P, Paetau A, Paljarvi L, Kalimo H, Kinnula VL, Soini Y, Haapasalo H. Peroxiredoxins and antioxidant enzymes in pilocytic astrocytomas. Clin Neuropathol. 2007;26(5):210–218. doi: 10.5414/npp26210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park CK, Jung JH, Moon MJ, Kim YY, Kim JH, Park SH, Kim CY, Paek SH, Kim DG, Jung HW, Cho BK. Tissue expression of manganese superoxide dismutase is a candidate prognostic marker for glioblastoma. Oncology. 2009;77(3-4):178–181. doi: 10.1159/000231888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Izutani R, Asano S, Imano M, Kuroda D, Kato M, Ohyanagi H. Expression of manganese superoxide dismutase in esophageal and gastric cancers. J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(6):816–822. doi: 10.1007/s005350050181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hermann B, Li Y, Ray MB, Wo JM, Martin RC2. Association of manganese superoxide dismutase expression with progression of carcinogenesis in Barrett esophagus. Arch Surg. 2005;140(12):1204–1209. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qi Y, Chiu JF, Wang L, Kwong DL, He QY. Comparative proteomic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Proteomics. 2005;5(11):2960–2971. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salzman R, Kankova K, Pacal L, Tomandl J, Horakova Z, Kostrica R. Increased activity of superoxide dismutase in advanced stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with locoregional metastases. Neoplasma. 2007;54(4):321–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lo WY, Tsai MH, Tsai Y, Hua CH, Tsai FJ, Huang SY, Tsai CH, Lai CC. Identification of over-expressed proteins in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients by clinical proteomic analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;376(1-2) doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ye H, Wang A, Lee BS, Yu T, Sheng S, Peng T, Hu S, Crowe DL, Zhou X. Proteomic based identification of manganese superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) as a metastasis marker for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2008;5(2) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Svensk AM, Soini Y, Paakko P, Hiravikoski P, Kinnula VL. Differential expression of superoxide dismutases in lung cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122(3):395–404. doi: 10.1309/A45Q-HB0Q-RRX6-CT9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kinnula VL, Pietarinen-Runtti P, Raivio K, Kahlos K, Pelin K, Mattson K, Linnainmaa K. Manganese superoxide dismutase in human pleural mesothelioma cell lines. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21(4):527–532. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(96)00049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kahlos K, Anttila S, Asikainen T, Kinnula K, Raivio KO, Mattson K, Linnainmaa K, Kinnula VL. Manganese superoxide dismutase in healthy human pleural mesothelium and in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;18(4):570–580. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.18.4.2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kahlos K, Soini Y, Paakko P, Saily M, Linnainmaa K, Kinnula VL. Proliferation, apoptosis, and manganese superoxide dismutase in malignant mesothelioma. Int J Cancer. 2000;88(1) doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001001)88:1<37::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kahlos K, Paakko P, Kurttila E, Soini Y, Kinnula VL. Manganese superoxide dismutase as a diagnostic marker for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br J Cancer. 2000;82(5) doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skrzycki M, Scibior D, Podsiad M, Czeczot H. Activity and protein level of CuZnSOD and MnSOD in benign and malignant liver tumors. Clin Biochem. 2008;41(1-2):91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malafa M, Margenthaler J, Webb B, Neitzel L, Christophersen M. MnSOD expression is increased in metastatic gastric cancer. J Surg Res. 2000;88(2):130–134. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim JJ, Chae SW, Hur GC, Cho SJ, Kim MK, Choi J, Nam SY, Kim WH, Yang HK, Lee BL. Manganese superoxide dismutase expression correlates with a poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Pathobiology. 2002;70(6) doi: 10.1159/000071276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nozoe T, Honda M, Inutsuka S, Yasuda M, Korenaga D. Significance of immunohistochemical expression of manganese superoxide dismutase as a marker of malignant potential in colorectal carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2003;10(1) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Monari M, Trinchero A, Calabrese C, Cattani O, Serrazanetti GP, Foschi J, Fabbri A, Zahlane D, Di Febo G, Tonini V, Cervellera M, Tosi MR, Tugnoli V. Superoxide dismutase in gastric adenocarcinoma: is it a clinical biomarker in the development of cancer? Biomarkers. 2006;11(6):574–584. doi: 10.1080/13547500600899134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Takeno A, Takemasa I, Doki Y, Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Matsubara K, Monden M. Integrative approach for differentially overexpressed genes in gastric cancer by combining large-scale gene expression profiling and network analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(8):1307–1315. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Monari M, Foschi J, Calabrese C, Liguori G, Di Febo G, Rizzello F, Gionchetti P, Trinchero A, Serrazanetti GP. Implications of antioxidant enzymes in human gastric neoplasms. Int J Mol Med. 2009;24(5):693–700. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Expression of the xenobiotic- and reactive oxygen species-detoxifying enzymes, GST-pi, Cu/Zn-SOD, and Mn-SOD in the endocrine cells of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25(12):1397–1405. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1041-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lewis A, Du J, Liu J, Ritchie JM, Oberley LW, Cullen JJ. Metastatic progression of pancreatic cancer: changes in antioxidant enzymes and cell growth. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22(7):523–532. doi: 10.1007/s10585-005-4919-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nozoe T, Honda M, Inutsuka S, Yasuda M, Korenaga D. Significance of immunohistochemical expression of manganese superoxide dismutase as a marker of malignant potential in colorectal carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2003;10(1):39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Quiros I, Sainz RM, Hevia D, Garcia-Suarez O, Astudillo A, Rivas M, Mayo JC. Upregulation of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) is a common pathway for neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(7):1497–1504. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Giesing M, Suchy B, Driesel G, Molitor D. Clinical utility of antioxidant gene expression levels in circulating cancer cell clusters for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL and disease prognostication after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;105(7):1000–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hempel N, Ye H, Abessi B, Mian B, Melendez JA. Altered redox status accompanies progression to metastatic human bladder cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009;46(1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsanou E, Ioachim E, Briasoulis E, Damala K, Charchanti A, Karavasilis V, Pavlidis N, Agnantis NJ. Immunohistochemical expression of superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) anti-oxidant enzyme in invasive breast carcinoma. Histol. Histopathol. 2004;19(3):807–813. doi: 10.14670/HH-19.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ria F, Landriscina M, Remiddi F, Rosselli R, Iacoangeli M, Scerrati M, Pani G, Borrello S, Galeotti T. The level of manganese superoxide dismutase content is an independent prognostic factor for glioblastoma. Biological mechanisms and clinical implications. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(4) doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang F, Xiao ZQ, Zhang XZ, Li C, Zhang PF, Li MY, Chen Y, Zhu GQ, Sun Y, Liu YF, Chen ZC. Identification of tumor antigens in human lung squamous carcinoma by serological proteome analysis. J Proteome Res. 2007;6(2) doi: 10.1021/pr0602287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Adzic M, Niciforovic A, Neskovic-Konstantinovic Z, Radojcic MB. Superoxide dismutases and p53 protein levels in blood cells of breast cancer patients. J BUON. 2004;9(3):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Giesing M, Suchy B, Driesel G, Molitor D. Clinical utility of antioxidant gene expression levels in circulating cancer cell clusters for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL and disease prognostication after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;105(7) doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hempel N, Ye H, Abessi B, Mian B, Melendez JA. Altered redox status accompanies progression to metastatic human bladder cancer. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46(1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Omar RA, Chyan YJ, Andorn AC, Poeggeler B, Robakis NK, Pappolla MA. Increased Expression but Reduced Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes in Alzheimer's Disease. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 1999;1(3):139–145. doi: 10.3233/jad-1999-1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shan W, Zhong W, Zhao R, Oberley TD. Thioredoxin 1 as a subcellular biomarker of redox imbalance in human prostate cancer progression. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010;49(12):2078–2087. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.10.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Clerch LB, Massaro D, Berkovich A. Molecular mechanisms of antioxidant enzyme expression in lung during exposure to and recovery from hyperoxia. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;274(3 Pt 1):L313–L319. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.274.3.L313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.John JP, Pollak A, Lubec G. Complete sequencing and oxidative modification of manganese superoxide dismutase in medulloblastoma cells. Electrophoresis. 2009;30(17):3006–3016. doi: 10.1002/elps.200900168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ramilo CA, Leveque V, Guan Y, Lepock JR, Tainer JA, Nick HS, Silverman DN. Interrupting the hydrogen bond network at the active site of human manganese superoxide dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274(39):27711–27716. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Davis CA, Hearn AS, Fletcher B, Bickford J, Garcia JE, Leveque V, Melendez JA, Silverman DN, Zucali J, Agarwal A, Nick HS. Potent anti-tumor effects of an active site mutant of human manganese-superoxide dismutase. Evolutionary conservation of product inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(13):12769–12776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310623200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Macmillan-Crow LA, Crow JP, Kerby JD, Beckman JS, Thompson JA. Nitration and inactivation of manganese superoxide dismutase in chronic rejection of human renal allografts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996;93(21):11853–11858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sutton A, Khoury H, Prip-Buus C, Cepanec C, Pessayre D, Degoul F. The Ala16Val genetic dimorphism modulates the import of human manganese superoxide dismutase into rat liver mitochondria. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13(3):145–157. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000054067.64000.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bag A, Bag N. Target Sequence Polymorphism of Human Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Gene and Its Association with Cancer Risk: A Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(12):3298–3305. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Huang Y, Peng J, Oberley LW, Domann FE. Transcriptional inhibition of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) gene expression by DNA methylation of the 5' CpG island. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23(2):314–320. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00095-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang Y, He T, Domann FE. Decreased expression of manganese superoxide dismutase in transformed cells is associated with increased cytosine methylation of the SOD2 gene. DNA Cell Biol. 1999;18(8) doi: 10.1089/104454999315051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hitchler MJ, Oberley LW, Domann FE. Epigenetic silencing of SOD2 by histone modifications in human breast cancer cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008;45(11):1573–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rohrdanz E, Kahl R. Alterations of antioxidant enzyme expression in response to hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998;24(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Josson S, Xu Y, Fang F, Dhar SK, St Clair DK, St Clair WH. RelB regulates manganese superoxide dismutase gene and resistance to ionizing radiation of prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 2006;25(10):1554–1559. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pani G, Colavitti R, Bedogni B, Fusco S, Ferraro D, Borrello S, Galeotti T. Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase: a promising target for new anticancer therapies. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11(10) doi: 10.2174/0929867043365297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dhar SK, Xu Y, St Clair DK. Nuclear factor kappaB- and specificity protein 1-dependent p53-mediated bi-directional regulation of the human manganese superoxide dismutase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285(13):9835–9846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.060715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pani G, Bedogni B, Anzevino R, Colavitti R, Palazzotti B, Borrello S, Galeotti T. Deregulated manganese superoxide dismutase expression and resistance to oxidative injury in p53-deficient cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60(16) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhao Y, Chaiswing L, Velez JM, Batinic-Haberle I, Colburn NH, Oberley TD, St Clair DK. p53 translocation to mitochondria precedes its nuclear translocation and targets mitochondrial oxidative defense protein-manganese superoxide dismutase. Cancer Res. 2005;65(9):3745–3750. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Perera CS, St Clair DK, McClain CJ. Differential regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase activity by alcohol and TNF in human hepatoma cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;323(2):471–476. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Siemankowski LM, Morreale J, Briehl MM. Antioxidant defenses in the TNF-treated MCF-7 cells: selective increase in MnSOD. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26(7-8):919–924. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00273-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Whitsett JA, Clark JC, Wispe JR, Pryhuber GS. Effects of TNF-alpha and phorbol ester on human surfactant protein and MnSOD gene transcription in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(6 Pt 1):L688–L693. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1992.262.6.L688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mocellin S, Nitti D. TNF and cancer: the two sides of the coin. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2774–2783. doi: 10.2741/2884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Szlosarek P, Charles KA, Balkwill FR. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha as a tumour promoter. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(6):745–750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Minig V, Kattan Z, van Beeumen J, Brunner E, Becuwe P. Identification of DDB2 protein as a transcriptional regulator of constitutive SOD2 gene expression in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(21):14165–14176. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808208200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Holley AK, Kiningham KK, Spitz DR, Edwards DP, Jenkins JT, Moore MR. Progestin stimulation of manganese superoxide dismutase and invasive properties in T47D human breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;117(1-3):23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu X, Yu J, Jiang L, Wang A, Shi F, Ye H, Zhou X. MicroRNA-222 regulates cell invasion by targeting matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and manganese superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2009;6(3):131–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhao Y, Oberley TD, Chaiswing L, Lin SM, Epstein CJ, Huang TT, St Clair D. Manganese superoxide dismutase deficiency enhances cell turnover via tumor promoter-induced alterations in AP-1 and p53-mediated pathways in a skin cancer model. Oncogene. 2002;21(24):3836–3846. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Oberley LW. Mechanism of the tumor suppressive effect of MnSOD overexpression. Biomed Pharmacother. 2005;59(4):143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Miele ME, McGary CT, Welch DR. SOD2 (MnSOD) does not suppress tumorigenicity or metastasis of human melanoma C8161 cells. Anticancer Res. 1995;15(5B):2065–2070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Connor KM, Hempel N, Nelson KK, Dabiri G, Gamarra A, Belarmino J, Van De WL, Mian BM, Melendez JA. Manganese superoxide dismutase enhances the invasive and migratory activity of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(21):10260–10267. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nelson KK, Ranganathan AC, Mansouri J, Rodriguez AM, Providence KM, Rutter JL, Pumiglia K, Bennett JA, Melendez JA. Elevated sod2 activity augments matrix metalloproteinase expression: evidence for the involvement of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in regulating metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9(1):424–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lam EW, Zwacka R, Seftor EA, Nieva DR, Davidson BL, Engelhardt JF, Hendrix MJ, Oberley LW. Effects of antioxidant enzyme overexpression on the invasive phenotype of hamster cheek pouch carcinoma cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27(5-6):572–579. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lemaitre V, D'Armiento J. Matrix metalloproteinases in development and disease. Birth Defects Res. C. Embryo. Today. 2006;78(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pardo A, Selman M. MMP-1: the elder of the family. Int. J Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005;37(2):283–288. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gialeli C, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS Journal. 2011;278(1):16–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhang HJ, Zhao W, Venkataraman S, Robbins ME, Buettner GR, Kregel KC, Oberley LW. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 by overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells involves reactive oxygen species. J Biol. Chem. 2002;277(23):20919–20926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109801200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kattan Z, Minig V, Leroy P, Dauca M, Becuwe P. Role of manganese superoxide dismutase on growth and invasive properties of human estrogen-independent breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008;108(2):203–215. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9597-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Dinney CP, Fishbeck R, Singh RK, Eve B, Pathak S, Brown N, Xie B, Fan D, Bucana CD, Fidler IJ. Isolation and characterization of metastatic variants from human transitional cell carcinoma passaged by orthotopic implantation in athymic nude mice. J Urol. 1995;154(4):1532–1538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nelson KK, Melendez JA. Mitochondrial redox control of matrix metalloproteinases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004;37(6):768–784. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nelson KK, Subbaram S, Connor KM, Dasgupta J, Ha XF, Meng TC, Tonks NK, Melendez JA. Redox-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression is regulated by JNK through Ets and AP-1 promoter motifs. J Biol. Chem. 2006;281(20):14100–14110. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601820200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ranganathan AC, Nelson KK, Rodriguez AM, Kim KH, Tower GB, Rutter JL, Brinckerhoff CE, Huang TT, Epstein CJ, Jeffrey JJ, Melendez JA. Manganese superoxide dismutase signals matrix metalloproteinase expression via H2O2-dependent ERK1/2 activation. J Biol. Chem. 2001;276(17):14264–14270. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100199200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yan C, Boyd DD. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase gene expression. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211(1):19–26. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kar S, Subbaram S, Carrico PM, Melendez JA. Redox-control of matrix metalloproteinase-1: a critical link between free radicals, matrix remodeling and degenerative disease. Respir. Physiol Neurobiol. 2010;174(3):299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Clark IM, Swingler TE, Sampieri CL, Edwards DR. The regulation of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Int. J Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008;40(6-7):1362–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Westermarck J, Seth A, Kahari VM. Differential regulation of interstitial collagenase (MMP-1) gene expression by ETS transcription factors. Oncogene. 1997;14(22):2651–2660. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Whitmarsh AJ, Davis RJ. Transcription factor AP-1 regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways. J Mol. Med. 1996;74(10):589–607. doi: 10.1007/s001090050063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Clerk A, Fuller SJ, Michael A, Sugden PH. Stimulation of “stress-regulated” mitogen-activated protein kinases (stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun N-terminal kinases and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinases) in perfused rat hearts by oxidative and other stresses. J Biol. Chem. 1998;273(13):7228–7234. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.13.7228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Frost JA, Geppert TD, Cobb MH, Feramisco JR. A requirement for extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) function in the activation of AP-1 by Ha-Ras, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and serum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994;91(9):3844–3848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Westermarck J, Kahari VM. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in tumor invasion. FASEB J. 1999;13(8):781–792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wenk J, Brenneisen P, Wlaschek M, Poswig A, Briviba K, Oberley TD, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Stable overexpression of manganese superoxide dismutase in mitochondria identifies hydrogen peroxide as a major oxidant in the AP-1-mediated induction of matrix-degrading metalloprotease-1. J Biol. Chem. 1999;274(36):25869–25876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tonks NK. Redox redux: revisiting PTPs and the control of cell signaling. Cell. 2005;121(5):667–670. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Leslie NR, Downes CP. PTEN function: how normal cells control it and tumour cells lose it. Biochem. J. 2004;382(Pt 1):1–11. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Leslie NR, Bennett D, Lindsay YE, Stewart H, Gray A, Downes CP. Redox regulation of PI 3-kinase signalling via inactivation of PTEN. EMBO J. 2003;22(20):5501–5510. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Connor KM, Subbaram S, Regan KJ, Nelson KK, Mazurkiewicz JE, Bartholomew PJ, Aplin AE, Tai YT, Aguirre-Ghiso J, Flores SC, Melendez JA. Mitochondrial H2O2 regulates the angiogenic phenotype via PTEN oxidation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(17):16916–16924. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410690200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Franca-Koh J, Kamimura Y, Devreotes PN. Leading-edge research: PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and directed migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(1):15–17. doi: 10.1038/ncb0107-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Leslie NR, Yang X, Downes CP, Weijer CJ. PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3)-dependent and -independent roles for PTEN in the control of cell migration. Curr. Biol. 2007;17(2):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kriegel AJ, Fang Y, Liu Y, Tian Z, Mladinov D, Matus IR, Ding X, Greene AS, Liang M. MicroRNA-target pairs in human renal epithelial cells treated with transforming growth factor beta 1: a novel role of miR-382. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(22):8338–8347. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Payne SL, Fogelgren B, Hess AR, Seftor EA, Wiley EL, Fong SF, Csiszar K, Hendrix MJ, Kirschmann DA. Lysyl oxidase regulates breast cancer cell migration and adhesion through a hydrogen peroxide-mediated mechanism. Cancer Res. 2005;65(24):11429–11436. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Dasgupta J, Kar S, Liu R, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B, Remington SJ, Chen C, Melendez JA. Reactive oxygen species control senescence-associated matrix metalloproteinase-1 through c-Jun-N-terminal kinase. J Cell Physiol. 2010;225(1):52–62. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kamata H, Honda S, Maeda S, Chang L, Hirata H, Karin M. Reactive oxygen species promote TNFalpha-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell. 2005;120(5):649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Epperly MW, Sikora CA, DeFilippi SJ, Gretton JA, Zhan Q, Kufe DW, Greenberger JS. Manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) inhibits radiation-induced apoptosis by stabilization of the mitochondrial membrane. Radiat Res. 2002;157(5):568–577. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0568:msdsir]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mohr A, Buneker C, Gough RP, Zwacka RM. MnSOD protects colorectal cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis by inhibition of Smac/DIABLO release. Oncogene. 2008;27(6):763–774. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wong GH, Goeddel DV. Induction of manganous superoxide dismutase by tumor necrosis factor: possible protective mechanism. Science. 1988;242(4880):941–944. doi: 10.1126/science.3263703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wong GH, Elwell JH, Oberley LW, Goeddel DV. Manganous superoxide dismutase is essential for cellular resistance to cytotoxicity of tumor necrosis factor. Cell. 1989;58(5):923–931. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90944-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhao Y, Kiningham KK, Lin SM, St Clair DK. Overexpression of MnSOD protects murine fibrosarcoma cells (FSa-II) from apoptosis and promotes a differentiation program upon treatment with 5-azacytidine: involvement of MAPK and NFkappaB pathways. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2001;3(3) doi: 10.1089/15230860152409022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sompol P, Xu Y, Ittarat W, Daosukho C, St Clair D. NF-kappaB-associated MnSOD induction protects against beta-amyloid-induced neuronal apoptosis. J Mol Neurosci. 2006;29(3):279–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mantymaa P, Siitonen T, Guttorm T, Saily M, Kinnula V, Savolainen ER, Koistinen P. Induction of mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase confers resistance to apoptosis in acute myeloblastic leukaemia cells exposed to etoposide. Br J Haematol. 2000;108(3):574–581. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01852.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Daosukho C, Ittarat W, Lin SM, Sawyer DB, Kiningham K, Lien YC, St Clair DK. Induction of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) mediates cardioprotective effect of tamoxifen (TAM). J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;39(5):792–803. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dasgupta J, Subbaram S, Connor KM, Rodriguez AM, Tirosh O, Beckman JS, Jourd'heuil D, Melendez JA. Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Protects from TNF-alpha-Induced Apoptosis by Increasing the Steady-State Production of H(2)O(2). Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2006;8(7-8):1295–1305. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Diehn M, Cho RW, Lobo NA, Kalisky T, Dorie MJ, Kulp AN, Qian D, Lam JS, Ailles LE, Wong M, Joshua B, Kaplan MJ, Wapnir I, Dirbas FM, Somlo G, Garberoglio C, Paz B, Shen J, Lau SK, Quake SR, Brown JM, Weissman IL, Clarke MF. Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature. 2009;458(7239):780–783. doi: 10.1038/nature07733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Brandt WD, Matsui W, Rosenberg JE, He X, Ling S, Schaeffer EM, Berman DM. Urothelial carcinoma: stem cells on the edge. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28(3-4):291–304. doi: 10.1007/s10555-009-9187-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.He X, Marchionni L, Hansel DE, Yu W, Sood A, Yang J, Parmigiani G, Matsui W, Berman DM. Differentiation of a highly tumorigenic basal cell compartment in urothelial carcinoma. Stem Cells. 2009;27(7):1487–1495. doi: 10.1002/stem.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Cerutti PA. Prooxidant states and tumor promotion. Science. 1985;227(4685):375–381. doi: 10.1126/science.2981433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.St Clair DK, Porntadavity S, Xu Y, Kiningham K. Transcription regulation of human manganese superoxide dismutase gene. Methods Enzymol. 2002;349:306–312. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)49345-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ishikawa K, Takenaga K, Akimoto M, Koshikawa N, Yamaguchi A, Imanishi H, Nakada K, Honma Y, Hayashi J. ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis. Science. 2008;320(5876):661–664. doi: 10.1126/science.1156906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kwei KA, Finch JS, Thompson EJ, Bowden GT. Transcriptional repression of catalase in mouse skin tumor progression. Neoplasia. 2004;6(5):440–448. doi: 10.1593/neo.04127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Min JY, Lim SO, Jung G. Downregulation of catalase by reactive oxygen species via hypermethylation of CpG island II on the catalase promoter. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(11):2427–2432. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Cao C, Leng Y, Liu X, Yi Y, Li P, Kufe D. Catalase is regulated by ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation. Role of the c-Abl and Arg tyrosine kinases. Biochemistry. 2003;42(35):10348–10353. doi: 10.1021/bi035023f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Graham KA, Kulawiec M, Owens KM, Li X, Desouki MM, Chandra D, Singh KK. NADPH oxidase 4 is an oncoprotein localized to mitochondria. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;10(3):223–231. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.3.12207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yamaura M, Mitsushita J, Furuta S, Kiniwa Y, Ashida A, Goto Y, Shang WH, Kubodera M, Kato M, Takata M, Saida T, Kamata T. NADPH oxidase 4 contributes to transformation phenotype of melanoma cells by regulating G2-M cell cycle progression. Cancer Res. 2009;69(6):2647–2654. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang M, Kirk JS, Venkataraman S, Domann FE, Zhang HJ, Schafer FQ, Flanagan SW, Weydert CJ, Spitz DR, Buettner GR, Oberley LW. Manganese superoxide dismutase suppresses hypoxic induction of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncogene. 2005;24(55) doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kaewpila S, Venkataraman S, Buettner GR, Oberley LW. Manganese superoxide dismutase modulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha induction via superoxide. Cancer Res. 2008;68(8) doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wang M, Kirk JS, Venkataraman S, Domann FE, Zhang HJ, Schafer FQ, Flanagan SW, Weydert CJ, Spitz DR, Buettner GR, Oberley LW. Manganese superoxide dismutase suppresses hypoxic induction of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor. Oncogene. 2005;24(55):8154–8166. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Connor KM, Hempel N, Nelson KK, Dabiri G, Gamarra A, Belarmino J, Van De Water L, Mian BM, Melendez JA. Manganese superoxide dismutase enhances the invasive and migratory activity of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(21):10260–10267. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Melendez JA, Davies KJ. Manganese superoxide dismutase modulates interleukin-1alpha levels in HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271(31):18898–18903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.31.18898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Freije WA, Castro-Vargas FE, Fang Z, Horvath S, Cloughesy T, Liau LM, Mischel PS, Nelson SF. Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival. Cancer Res. 2004;64(18):6503–6510. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Rhodes DR, Cao X, Wang L, Dhanasekaran SM, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Wei JT, Rubin MA, Pienta KJ, Shah RB, Chinnaiyan AM. Integrative molecular concept modeling of prostate cancer progression. Nat Genet. 2007;39(1):41–51. doi: 10.1038/ng1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ivshina AV, George J, Senko O, Mow B, Putti TC, Smeds J, Lindahl T, Pawitan Y, Hall P, Nordgren H, Wong JE, Liu ET, Bergh J, Kuznetsov VA, Miller LD. Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(21):10292–10301. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ, Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415(6871):530–536. doi: 10.1038/415530a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES